About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract


Volume: 17 (1933)

Issue: 9. (September)

First Page: 1025

Last Page: 1083

Title: Mechanics of Formation of Previous HitSaltNext Hit Domes with Special Reference to Gulf Coast Previous HitSaltNext Hit Domes of Texas and Louisiana

Author(s): Donald C. Barton (2)

Abstract:

The Previous HitsaltNext Hit of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit domes of some areas is known to be sedimentary. Geological observation of those domes and laboratory experimentation show that Previous HitsaltNext Hit flows plastically under differential pressure. The German Previous HitsaltNext Hit domes are known to have been formed by the plastic flowage of the Zechstein Previous HitsaltNext Hit series. Any type of differential pressure should tend to produce plastic flowage of sedimentary Previous HitsaltNext Hit whenever certain critical conditions such as those of pressure, temperature, and time have been exceeded. The plausible sources of pressure are two: (1) the static pressure of the overlying sediments; and (2) the dynamic pressure of tangential compression or thrust. Under (1), growth of the Previous HitdomeNext Hit by upthrust can take place only if the available energy is sufficient both to overcome riction and to uplift the Previous HitsaltNext Hit core and some sediments against gravity; growth of the Previous HitdomeNext Hit by downbuilding can take place if the mother Previous HitsaltNext Hit bed is sinking in earth space; the position of maximum uplift is below that of isostatic equilibrium of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit core; and the form of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit Previous HitdomeNext Hit should evolve progressively through a characteristic series of forms. Under (2), the horizontal dynamic pressure will act indirectly upward through anticlines and downward through synclines in competent beds; and directly through horizontal squeezing of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit in relatively upthrust cores. The static thrust of (1) will be active and may be more important than the dynamic thrust of (2); the position of maximum upthrust of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit core may be far above its position of isostatic equilibrium; the form of the domes should be varied.

The Gulf Coast domes have been formed by the plastic flowage of sedimentary Previous HitsaltNext Hit intrusively into the overlying sediments. The evidence for that origin of the domes comes from the structure which is revealed by oil-field drilling, from algal remains in the Previous HitsaltNext Hit, and from the close similarity of the American Previous HitsaltNext Hit domes to the German Previous HitsaltNext Hit domes. The age of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit is greater than most of the Lower Cretaceous. The motive force of the formation of the domes has been the static weight of the sediments. Growth of the domes has taken place throughout the Tertiary and has taken place on a few domes in the most recent past. There was no dynamic tangential compression in the Gulf Coastal Plain area during the Tertiary and Quaternary; therefore, the motive

End_Page 1025------------------------------

force presumably must have been the static thrust of the sediments. Subsidence of the mother Previous HitsaltNext Hit bed took place almost continuously through the Tertiary and into the Quaternary. The difference between the specific gravity of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit and of the sediments is small; and the calculated force of upthrust is small, rather too small to overcome friction and to uplift the Previous HitsaltNext Hit core and some sediments against gravity. Growth of the domes, therefore, must have been largely by downbuilding. Partially corroboratory evidence is given by the concomitant cessation of growth of the Clay Creek Previous HitdomeNext Hit and cessation of the regional subsidence of the general surrounding area. But some actual upthrust has taken place on the Gulf Coast domes; and, as theoretically expectable, it tends to be greater on the omes of larger diameter. Growth has not continued into recent time on all the domes and has ceased finally at different times on different domes. The law holds crudely that the deeper the Previous HitdomeNext Hit, the older the time of cessation of growth. The final cessation of growth in general may have been caused by exhaustion of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit in the mother Previous HitsaltNext Hit bed, attainment of isostatic equilibrium, frictional freezing of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit core to the sediments, and, in the case of downbuilding, by cessation of the subsidence. The succession of retrograde movement of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit core after the cessation of growth is suggested, inconclusively, by the Clay Creek Previous HitdomeNext Hit. The presence of rim synclines has been suggested by the results of torsion-balance surveys, but has not been identified from geologic data. Rim syncline could be formed: (1) by solution of the flank of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit, and (2) by the pushing-in of the deep flank of a flaring Previous HitsaltNext Hit core in the growth of the Previous HitdomeNext Hit. Overhang of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit and cap is present in two types: (1) tilting of the vertical axis of the Previous HitdomeTop, and (2) mushrooming (Barbers Hill). Type (1) is produced perhaps by the seaward flowage of the deeper sediments. The explanations of type (2) are not satisfactory.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].