About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract


Volume: 50 (1966)

Issue: 9. (September)

First Page: 2035

Last Page: 2036

Title: Cyclic Sedimentary Sequences in Frontier Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Casper Arch Area, Wyoming, and Some Stratigraphic and Possible Paleoenvironmental Implications: ABSTRACT

Author(s): John P. Hobson, Jr.

Article Type: Meeting abstract

Abstract:

The Frontier Formation is generally about 1,000 ft. thick in the Casper arch area and consists of a series

End_Page 2035------------------------------

of asymmetric, upward-coarsening, depositional sequences referred to here as "cycles." Four major cycles called sandstone "zones" by others, have been studied in exposures and mapped in the subsurface in a preliminary manner. Thinner, less conspicuous cycles occur within each major cycle.

Where typically developed, a cycle begins with relatively non-sandy gray shale at the base and becomes progressively more sandy upward, terminating where the cycle is thickest with a conspicuous body of fine- to medium-grained, submature to mature, chert-rich orthoquartzite having a relatively sharp upper boundary. Chert-rich pebble conglomerate of uncertain origin occurs in places within the sandier parts of the cycles.

Detailed correlations of bentonitic layers reveal that the major cycles pinch and swell laterally in a complex but generally systematic manner, displaying two- to four-fold thickness variations. The relatively thick parts of each major cycle generally lie on flanks of the underlying cycle. Proceeding upward through the sequence, axes of maximum sandstone development are offset progressively eastward away from the central Casper arch. The uppermost cycle also is relatively thick and sandy on the arch.

Upward coarsening within the cycles and the complex, but orderly, shifting pattern of the depositional axes of the major cycles suggest that the rate of sediment influx exceeded the rate of subsidence in the area during deposition of the Frontier. The thickness variations are not most plausibly explained by differential compaction or by differential subsidence, at least in the lower three major cycles. Thickness trends suggest that the major source of sand was north and northwest of the Casper arch area.

Although the cycles appear to be essentially regressive in nature, sand deposition under transgressive conditions is suggested in places by more glauconitic and (or) calcareous upper parts of the sandstone bodies. West of the Casper arch, coaly beds and channel-like conglomerate lenses directly overlie sandstone bodies in cycles that otherwise are similar. Definite evidence of non-marine deposition has not been observed in the Casper arch study area and general observations suggest that the sequence is essentially marine. As reasoned from stratigraphic observations, the general slope at the top of the lowermost major cycle did not exceed ½° and the maximum depth of water in the area was about 100 ft.

Although understanding of the depositional agents must await additional studies specifically aimed at this objective, some analogies are drawn between gross characteristics of the cycles and typical features of deltaic deposits along modern shorelines.

More realistic concepts of the internal geometry and genesis of sandstone and shale complexes could be of considerable aid to the petroleum geologist in explaining and predicting oil and gas occurrences.

End_of_Article - Last_Page 2036------------

Copyright 1997 American Association of Petroleum Geologists