About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract


Volume: 52 (1968)

Issue: 1. (January)

First Page: 196

Last Page: 196

Title: Critical Evaluation of Hardeman Basin and Its Environs: ABSTRACT

Author(s): John E. Thornton

Article Type: Meeting abstract

Abstract:

Geologically the Hardeman basin is the easternmost extension of the elongate, east-west-trending geologic province known as the Palo Duro basin. Although the Hardeman basin apparently has not been subjected to the same violent structural unrest as other parts of North Texas (therefore, almost no structure is related to faulting), it is an area of prolific oil fields having traps of a peculiar type. Except for Conley, the largest Hardeman County oil field, oil traps here have almost no primary porosity. They seem to be either erosion remnants or small biohermal reefs with 100-200 ft of relief which have been vigorously and effectively leached by dolomitizing waters, leaving the limestone with secondary porosity values ranging from pin-point vugular to cavernous.

Since the 1959 discovery of Conley, it and 14 smaller fields have produced almost 10 million bbl of oil. This added to the 20 million bbl of oil produced from the Fargo and Odell fields of northwest Wilbarger County, raise the total for the Hardeman basin to 30 million bbl.

Seismic methods still provide the most reliable evidence of structure in the Hardeman basin, though increased drilling continually adds to the possibility of subsurface geological leads. As more fields are discovered, and more is understood of their structural form, there seems an increased demand for greater seismic accuracy which, because of the stratigraphic nature of the upper beds in the basin, is beyond the capacity of seismic tools. Most fields in the basin before discovery appeared on seismic maps as small low-relief closures or noses on positive structural trends. Many more such features are known, and must be explored.

Economically the Hardeman basin offers the highest return on investment of any area in North Texas. Because individual wells from various fields yield engineering reserve estimates as great as 1 million bbl of recoverable oil, a return as great as 30:1 is a reality. Such high returns normally are found, or anticipated, only in Gulf Coast exploration.

Though exploration costs are high in order to test the commonly cavernous Lower Mississippian "lime" at 8,500 ft (this is the prolific oil producer of Hardeman County), the Hardeman basin has a multiple-pay stratigraphic section to that depth, as shown by the presence of producing reservoirs in the Cisco-Canyon section (beginning at 3,900 ft), the Canyon limestone (normally Palo Pinto) below 5,000 ft, the Des Moines (Strawn) section of sandstone and conglomerate (from 6,000-7,300 ft), the Mississippian conglomerate (Holmes Sand) at 7,700 ft, the Mississippian limestone (Chappel and Osage) from 8,000 to 8,500 ft, and the Ellenberger dolomite below 8,500 ft (now producing only at Conley).

Exploration in the past has been aided by acreage and "dry-hole" support from major companies which control large blocks of leases. It is hoped this support will continue, but even without it exploration will continue in the Hardeman basin and westward into the Palo Duro basin, because positive exploration results in the Hardeman basin are already too great, and the promise for future successful exploration too strong, to discourage those men of vision who search for new oil.

End_of_Article - Last_Page 196------------

Copyright 1997 American Association of Petroleum Geologists