About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract


Volume: 58 (1974)

Issue: 10. (October)

First Page: 2206

Last Page: 2207

Title: Early Cretaceous Stuart City Shelf Margin of South Texas: Its Depositional and Diagenetic Environments and Their Relation to Porosity: ABSTRACT

Author(s): D. G. Bebout

Article Type: Meeting abstract

Abstract:

The Stuart City trend, South Texas, represents a climax biogenic development along the Early Cretaceous (late Aptian, Albian, and early Cenomanian) shelf margin. Landward of this trend, a wide variety of shallow-water shelf carbonate sediments accumulated on a broad, relatively flat platform. Seaward, the entire section consists of dark planktonic foraminifer-bearing argillaceous carbonate sediments. The sediments of the Stuart City trend make up the Stuart City limestone, which attains a total thickness of 2,000 to 2,500 ft. Time-equivalent rocks which crop out in central Texas are the Glen Rose and Edwards Formations. Between 1954 and 1961 many wells ranging in depth from 11,000 to 20,000 ft were drilled with the Stuart City Formation as their final objective. Of the 19 wells from which cores were obtained for this study, 12 were considered gas wells with initial production ranging from 1.5 to 36.5 MMCFGD. Six of these wells still produce gas. Depositional facies and environments and their relation to the diagenesis and porosity development provide a model for further hydrocarbon exploration along the Stuart City and the deeper Sligo trends.

The Stuart City carbonate rocks have been assigned to five major environments of deposition: shelf lagoon, shelf margin, upper shelf slope, lower shelf slope, and open marine. The shelf-lagoon facies include miliolid wackestone, mollusk wackestone, toucasid wackestone, and mollusk-miliolid grainstone. These facies accumulated in generally low-energy condition in water depths from 0 to 20 ft. In contrast, the narrow band of shelf-margin carbonate rocks is made up of coral-caprinid boundstone, requienid boundstone, and rudist grainstone, all of which accumulated in moderate to high-energy conditions and in less than 15 ft of water as a complex of reefs, banks, bars, and islands. Seaward of the shelf margin, the upper shelf-slope environment comprises the caprinid-coral wackestone and co al-stromatoporoid boundstone facies, the lower shelf slope, the intraclast-grainstone, echinoid-packstone, and echinoid-mollusk-wackestone facies. Farther seaward in water depths greater than 60 ft, the open-marine environment is represented by the planktonic-foraminifer wackestone basins.

Porosities in the carbonate rocks of the Stuart City trend are divisible into two main types, those which are fabric related and

End_Page 2206------------------------------

those which are nonfabric related. Primary fabric-related types consist of intraparticle and interparticle. Primary intraparticle porosity, openings within the body chambers of the rudists, is present in the caprinid-coral wackestone, coral-caprinid boundstone, and requienid boundstone. Primary interparticle porosity was originally very high (greater than 30 percent) in the rudist grainstone facies but cementation soon after deposition--submarine, phreatic, and meteoric--reduced the porosity to less than 10 percent, and late subsurface cementation filled the remaining porosity. Primary interparticle porosity now is present only in a few very thin intervals.

Secondary fabric related porosity consists of solution-enlarged interparticle and moldic. Both occur in the boundstone and grainstone facies but in very thin restricted units. The poor development of solution enlarged interparticle and moldic porosity reflects the minor role that subaerial exposure played during the development of Stuart City trend.

Nonfabric related porosity consists of vertical fractures. This type of porosity is present in abundance in several studied wells in the form of open, nonlined, vertical fractures.

The low porosities along the Stuart City Trend are the result of two processes--(1) lack of significant periods of subaerial exposure for development of secondary porosity types and (2) massive cementation which destroyed primary porosity. Further exploration along this trend should be aimed at identifying areas which may have been exposed soon after deposition and developed secondary porosity or areas which subsided more rapidly and have preserved primary porosity.

End_of_Article - Last_Page 2207------------

Copyright 1997 American Association of Petroleum Geologists