Cratonic unconformities represent (1) coincidence of surfaces of sedimentary accumulation with depositional base level, or elevation of depositional surfaces above erosional base level and (2) renewed deposition covering surfaces of nondeposition or erosion. The chronostratigraphic record of unconformities is best displayed on Wheeler diagrams on which geographic distances are plotted against chronostratigraphic intervals or absolute time. Assessment of the lithostratigraphic significance of unconformities requires reconstruction of the pre-unconformity stratigraphy and estimation of the thickness (or volume) of the strata eroded and of their lithologic character.

Interregional unconformities fall into two major types: (1) those marked by subequal values of nondeposition and erosion, commonly involving 5 to 30 Ma and the stripping of as much as 1 km over very broad areas; the sub-Kaskaskia unconformity (Early Devonian to Early Carboniferous) is an example; and (2) unconformities characterized by short-term nondeposition (< 5 Ma) and extremes of erosional vacuity; e.g., the sub-Absaroka surface (Late Carboniferous).

Conventional wisdom would suggest that episodes of cratonic nondeposition and erosion should equate with accelerated detrital deposition at continental margins and with perturbations of marine chemistry. Evidence is accumulating to indicate a degree of concomitance between cratonic events and oceanic geochemistry but no complementary pattern is clear in terms of slope/rise depositional rates. Indeed, certain major unconformities identified on continental slopes appear to have equivalents on cratons. These and related questions demand increased communication between land-based and seagoing stratigraphic and tectonic specialists.

End_of_Article - Last_Page 993------------