About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract


Volume: 66 (1982)

Issue: 5. (May)

First Page: 553

Last Page: 553

Title: Geometry of Tertiary Coal Seams as a Response to Changes in Structural Framework: ABSTRACT

Author(s): Paul L. Broughton

Article Type: Meeting abstract

Abstract:

Diminished subsidence of the Williston basin at the end of the Cretaceous was followed by accumulation of thick lignite seams in the Ravenscrag Formation (Paleocene). The formation of seven coal fields in southern Saskatchewan was also influenced by contemporaneous subsidence structures that originated as collapse of overlying strata above areas of salt leaching from the buried Devonian Elk Point evaporite basin. Lignite seams, up to 10 m thick, accumulated in successively younger coal fields that prograded to the southeast across southern Saskatchewan toward the cratonic depocenter in western North Dakota. The shape of the older coal basins conformed to the areas of salt solution activity and both the coal fields and component beds accumulated as circular forms. Salt-sol tion collapse effects diminished upsection with more pronounced cratonic influence that originated with intermittent movements between Precambrian crustal blocks forming the Williston basin. The thicker areas of coal seams in the middle of the 300-m coal-bearing section accumulated parallel with the cratonic lineaments but oblique to the coal-basin forms that retained a geometric relation to the salt solution. The uppermost coal basins were almost completely dominated by cratonic influence with thick coal bed areas parallel with cratonic lineaments and dispersed in a reticulate pattern. Younger coal fields distant from the cratonic depocenter were elongated parallel with lineaments oriented toward the cratonic depocenter, whereas coal fields next to the center of the Williston basin accu ulated as arcuate forms along the strike of the basin. The activity of salt-solution subsidence structures during the formation of the uppermost coal fields was sufficiently weak to favor greater regional bed thickness but not affect lateral basin form.

End_of_Article - Last_Page 553------------

Copyright 1997 American Association of Petroleum Geologists