About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin


Volume: 69 (1985)

Issue: 9. (September)

First Page: 1452

Last Page: 1452

Title: Thick-Skinned, Thin-Skinned, and Previous HitBalancedNext Hit Sections of Southern Appalachians: ABSTRACT

Author(s): Nicholas B. Woodward, Peter T. Regan, Charles T. Lutz

Article Type: Meeting abstract


The conflict between thick-skinned and thin-skinned thrust belt hypotheses in the southern Appalachians has been conclusively decided in favor of the thin-skinned interpretation by seismic surveys and drilling results. Previous HitBalancedNext Hit cross sections are a logical development stemming from the thin-skinned thrusting hypothesis. Three detailed Previous HitbalancedNext Hit sections across the region (northern Alabama, Knoxville area, and Blacksburg area) are compared with the early thin-skinned and thick-skinned models of Rodgers, Cooper, and Chamberlin. In Virginia, Cooper's hypothesis about the order of thrusting and synchronous evolution of structures associated with basement fault motion have been disproved by modern mapping, fabric, and paleontologic work. In northeast Tennessee, the no-basement ypothesis has been relatively well established since the work of Rich. In the Alabama-Georgia segment, discussion continues about the origin of some major structures. Previous HitBalancedNext Hit section concepts require that the sections be restored to their pre-deformational configurations.

In retrospect, the geologic reasoning based on surface stratigraphic thicknesses and structural styles should have convinced us of the thin-skinned nature of thrusts without the seismic data that seemed essential at the time. The COCORP seismic results should have been no surprise had the geologic reasoning of Previous HitbalancedTop sections been believed.

End_of_Article - Last_Page 1452------------

Copyright 1997 American Association of Petroleum Geologists