About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract


Volume: 79 (1995)

Issue: 12. (December)

First Page: 1737

Last Page: 1756

Title: Geologic Evolution of a Pliocene-Pleistocene Salt-Withdrawal Minibasin: Eugene Island Block 330, Offshore Louisiana

Author(s): Laurel L. Alexander (2), Peter B. Flemings (3)

Abstract:

The spatial and temporal distributions of reservoir sands are documented within the context of an evolving Pliocene-Pleistocene salt-withdrawal shelf minibasin. The Eugene Island Block 330 field, a giant oil and gas field in offshore Louisiana, is contained within the minibasin. Based on the stratigraphic and structural analyses, we present a sequence-stratigraphic and tectonic-stratigraphic model for reservoir prediction in complex shelf Gulf of Mexico minibasins.

The minibasin evolved in three phases: prodelta, proximal deltaic, and fluvial. In the prodelta phase, bathyal and outer neritic shales and turbidites loaded and mobilized an underlying salt sheet. During the proximal deltaic phase, salt continued to withdraw from beneath the minibasin, and lowstand shelf margin deltas remained at a regional fault zone on the northern margin of the minibasin. Sediment accumulation and fault slip rates were high as thick sequences of deltaic sands were deposited adjacent to the fault system. During the final fluvial phase, salt withdrawal waned; consequently, the creation of accommodation space within the minibasin ceased. The basin infilled and, during lowstands, deltaic systems prograded southward. Unconformities developed in the minibasin during the e lowstands. During transgressions, thick packages of shallow-water deltaic and fluvial sands (capped by shales) were deposited on top of the unconformities.

One major reservoir, the Lentic, was deposited during the prodelta phase. The hydrocarbons are trapped by deep early faults within this geopressured sand. Most of the major exploited reservoirs of the Block 330 field were deposited in the proximal deltaic phase. Reservoirs deposited in this phase are laterally extensive proximal deltaic sands that have good lateral seals because of the amount of fault activity that occurred in this interval. Only one major reservoir was deposited in the fluvial phase. This reservoir was deposited while the basin-bounding faults were still active, so the reservoir has four-way closure. Sands deposited later in the fluvial phase tend to lack lateral seals and structural closure.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].