About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
.
1Manuscript received June 24, 1996; revised manuscript received
June 16, 1998; final acceptance July 14, 1998.
2Department. of Geological Sciences, Cornell University,
Ithaca, New York 14853; e-mail: [email protected]
3Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods
Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543.
4Chevron Overseas Petroleum, Inc., San Ramon, California
94583.
5Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan 49931.
gouge
capillary
entry pressure measurements were performed under the auspices of Exxon
Production Research Company; we thank them for release of these data. The
manuscript has benefited significantly from discussions with Doug McDowell
of MTU, Dave Pevear and Peter Vrolijk at Exxon Production Research, Larry
Cathles of Cornell University, and Jeff Seewald of WHOI, and reviews by
Jim Boles, University of California-Santa Barbara, Jean Whelan, WHOI, and
AAPG Bulletin reviewers Grant Skerlec, Lee Fairchild, and Dan Berg. Losh
thanks Laurel Alexander for providing a preprint of her fault plane paper
coauthored with Jim Handschy, and Peter Flemings for providing a manuscript
regarding fluid pressures. This is WHOI contribution No. 9829.
ABSTRACT
Simple modeling of coupled heat and mass flux indicates the paleothermal
anomaly in the fault zone intersected by A6ST well was short-lived, having
a duration less than 150 yr. The anomaly could have been produced by a
2 ´ 106 m3 pulse
of fluid ascending the fault at an actual velocity of over 1 km/yr (Darcy
flux of 330 m/yr) from 3 km deeper in the basin. Simple Darcy law computation
indicates a transient fault permeability on the order of 110 md during
this flow. Pulsing of fluid up the fault was probably the norm, although
most flow did not produce such strong thermal anomalies as the one detected
in the A6ST well.
Analysis of fluid pressures shows that the main fault is a profound
lateral permeability barrier having up to 1800 psi of water pressure differential
across it. The hydrocarbon sealing capacity of the fault depends on the
pressure difference across the fault. Fault permeability is best understood
in terms of effective stress. Under ambient conditions, the fault is at
high pressure relative to downthrown reservoirs. A pulse of high-pressure
fluid ascending
End page 244----------------
the fault lowers effective stress in the fault zone sufficiently to
produce a significant transient increase in permeability. If the fluid
is in an area of the fault adjacent to downthrown, relatively low pressure
reservoir sands, the fluid will discharge into them. Permeability in and
adjacent to the fault then decreases, such that fluid cannot reenter the
fault zone and escape from the reservoir.
gouge
zone at the top of the fault
cut in the well; this effect diminishes with distance from this
gouge
zone.
Cuttings from other wells in South Eugene Island Block 330 show slightly
elevated vitrinite reflectance in fault intercepts relative to sediments
outside the fault zone. Overall, indicators of mass and heat flux indicate
the main growth fault zone in South Eugene Island Block 330 has acted as
a conduit for ascending fluids, although the cumulative fluxes vary along
strike. This conclusion is corroborated by oil and gas distribution in
downthrown sands in Blocks 330 and 331, which identify the fault system
in northwestern Block 330 as a major feeder.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].