About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

(Begin page 1775)

AAPG Bulletin, V. 84, No. 11 (November 2000), P. 1775–1789.

Copyright ©2000. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of possible gas microseepage mechanisms

Alton Brown1

1ARCO, 2300 West Plano Parkway, Plano, Texas 75075; email: [email protected]

AUTHORS

Alton Brown has worked with the exploration research group at ARCO for the last 20 years on various topics of carbonate sedimentation and diagenesis, petroleum migration, hydrodynamics, and inorganic gas geochemistry. He is now retired.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

ARCO is gratefully acknowledged for release of this article. I thank ARCO reviewers Mark McCaffrey, Paul Willette, and Ron Gajdica for help with clarity and scope. I also thank AAPG reviewers Alain-Yves Huc, Ronald Klusman, and Peter Gretner for constructive reviews of the original manuscript.

ABSTRACT

Petroleum microseepage anomalies over petroleum accumulations are commonly explained by rapid, vertical migration of colloidal gas bubbles through fracture networks. This article is a theoretical anal ysis of this mechanism and of continuous gas-phase flow in frac tures. The gas-Previous HitbubbleTop ascent mechanism is much slower than re ported microseepage velocities, so it cannot account for observed microseepage. In contrast, continuous gas-phase flow through frac tures can equal or exceed reported microseepage velocity, while maintaining total flux low enough so that petroleum accumulations can exist for geological lengths of time. Fracture entry pressure for bubbles is more than twice that of a continuous gas phase, so con tinuous gas-phase migration also requires a lower pressure threshold before initiating seepage. Vertical microseepage is therefore best explained by the same mechanism interpreted for macroseepage.

Although this article provides a theoretically justified mecha nism for microseepage, it also shows why interpretation of surface microseepage signals is problematic. Fracture geometry controls seepage velocity and flux, so geochemical anomalies may indicate an increase in fracture aperture, as well as possible subsurface ac cumulations. Larger fractures require very low gas capillary entry pressures, so in some settings, surface seepage could result from fractures over stratal migration pathways, as well as over petroleum accumulations.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Protected Document: $10
Internal PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].