About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, V. 88, No. 2 (2004), P. 193-211.

Copyright copy2004. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

Origin of overpressures in shales: Constraints from basin modeling

Hege M. Nordgaringrd Bolarings,1 Christian Hermanrud,2 Gunn M. G. Teige3

1Statoil ASA, Arkitekt Ebbelsvei 10, Rotvoll, N-7005 Trondheim, Norway; [email protected]
2Statoil ASA, Arkitekt Ebbelsvei 10, Rotvoll, N-7005 Trondheim, Norway; [email protected]
3Statoil ASA, Arkitekt Ebbelsvei 10, Rotvoll, N-7005 Trondheim, Norway; [email protected]

AUTHORS

Hege M. Nordgaringrd Bolarings received her M.Sc. degree in petroleum geology from the Norwegian Institute of Technology in Trondheim. She joined Esso Norge A.S. in Stavanger, Norway, in 1985 and worked there as an explorationist until 1992. Her research work includes basin modeling at the Institute for Continental Shelf Research in Trondheim from 1992 until 1994, and since then she has worked on hydrocarbon trapping mechanisms at Statoil's Research Center.

Christian Hermanrud is currently project leader at Statoil's Research Center. He has an M.Sc. degree in applied mathematics from the University of Bergen, Norway, and a Ph.D. in geological sciences from the University of South Carolina, Columbia. His background includes 20 years of hydrocarbon exploration and exploration-related research.

Gunn M. G. Teige received her M.Sc. degree in 1990 in petroleum geology from the Norwegian Institute of Technology in Trondheim, Norway. She joined Statoil in 1991 and worked as an explorationist and petrophysicist for three years before joining Statoil's Research Center in 1994. Her major research interests are sealing analysis and leakage processes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to Statoil for granting permission to publish this study. We also appreciate the graphic support by Lars Reistad. Tom Schutter and Rachel Shannon of Platte River Associates and Magnus Wangen of the Institute for Energy Technology are thanked for assistance and support in performing the computer modeling of well 34/10-35. P. A. Bjoslashrkum, A. M. Spencer, P. K. Mukhopadhyay, J. D. Shosa, and an anonymous referee are thanked for constructive comments to an earlier version of this manuscript.

ABSTRACT

Techniques for detection, evaluation, and prediction of pore pressures in low-permeability rocks and equations for fluid-pressure computations in most integrated basin-modeling software are based on relationships between porosity and effective stress in shales. However, recent data show that overpressured shales in the North Sea do not exhibit higher porosities than the normally pressured shales of the same formation at similar depths.

To further evaluate the existence of porosity vs. effective stress relationships in shales, fluid-flow simulations and porosity modeling in a typical high-pressure and high-temperature well in the North Sea were undertaken. The parameters in the permeability and porosity equations were adjusted until a satisfactory fit was achieved between the observed and modeled porosity and fluid pressure at present. However, the modeled porosity and pore pressure vs. depth history of the sediments deviated significantly from known porosity and pore pressure vs. depth relationships that have been observed in North Sea shales and elsewhere today.

Because the results from basin modeling based on porosity-stress relationships were unacceptable, irrespective of parameter choices, and the well data from the North Sea show no signs of elevated porosities in the overpressured shales, it is inferred that effective stress-driven compaction alone has not generated the hard overpressures observed in deeply buried North Sea shales. These conclusions are suggested to be generally applicable to shales with low porosities and hard overpressures worldwide, both because of the physics involved and because similar results can be extracted from published modeling in the Niger Delta.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].