About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, V. 88, No. 8 (August 2004), P. 1123-1147.

Copyright copy2004. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

Geomorphology: An approach to determining subsurface reservoir dimensions

Robert S. Tye

PetroTel Inc., Suite 207, 5240 Tennyson Parkway, Plano, Texas 75024; [email protected]

AUTHOR

Robert S. (Bo) Tye is a consulting geologist with PetroTel Inc. in Plano, Texas. His interest in sedimentology and depositional systems was piqued during childhood visits to the beach and while exploring the coastal rivers near Charleston, South Carolina. He holds degrees from the College of Charleston, University of South Carolina, University of Alaska, Anchorage, and Louisiana State University. Prior employment, primarily as a reservoir geologist, includes stints at Cities Service Company, the Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), and Phillips Petroleum Company. Bo has worked on exploration and development projects in numerous areas including Alaska, Venezuela, Indonesia, and Russia.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank all of my coworkers with whom I have shared work experiences and knowledge. Among those to whom I am especially grateful are J. A. Lorsong, J. P. Bhattacharya, D. K. Knock, B. A. Watson, M. Scheihing, E. R. Gustason, and A. Chopra. Doug Knock and Becky Watson were great help in the field. C. E. Ahnupkana is thanked for his enthusiasm and knowledge as a Colville River guide. The Kuukpik Corporation and Langston Chinn graciously provided lodging in Nuiqsut and access to native lands. B. A. Burns, D. Seifert, and J. Hand have been great companions in reservoir-modeling projects, and they patiently humored me during modeling trials. Their ideas, insights, and constructive criticisms provided much needed reality checks. The enthusiastic and cheerful encouragement of P. A. Barker, D. W. Masterson, T. Verseput, E. West, C. Mosely, and R. K. Morse is appreciated. C. Suchland introduced me to the perfect software for use in quantifying geomorphology. Katherine Hale provided graphic support and advice. J. S Bridge and C. T. Feazel are thanked for their insights and constructive comments on the first draft. AAPG reviewers B. Horn, R. Moiola, K. W. Shanley, W. L. Watney, and an anonymous reviewer are thanked for their helpful comments and suggestions. In particular, suggestions by C. P. North are appreciated. AAPG Editor John Lorenz is thanked for his patience and support.

ABSTRACT

Modern depositional settings provide unambiguous geomorphic data facilitating the quantification of geologic interpretations for the numerical characterization of subsurface strata. Traditional three-dimensional geologic descriptions are limited by one- and two-dimensional data sources: generally well and outcrop data. However, geomorphic analyses of fluviodeltaic systems yield size distributions for discrete sedimentary units. These distributions provide constraints for conditioning the area (X and Y dimensions), shape, placement, and preferred orientation(s) of sedimentary units in reservoir models.

Dimensional data for channel belts, channels, channel bars, crevasse splays, distributary channels, and distributary mouth bars from the fluvially dominated deltas of the Alaska North Slope and the Louisiana Gulf Coast reveal log-normal distributions for their lengths and widths. Modern analogs provide statistical constraints for conditioning data input for geologic facies associations in object-based reservoir models.

Geomorphic data from modern fluviodeltaic analogs are linked with core and wire-lineā€“log data to render conditioned, three-dimensional geologic models. Model accuracy relies on bed thickness and chronostratigraphic constraints imposed by cores and stratigraphic correlations, as well as the lateral extent of facies associations governed by geomorphology. These object-based reservoir models demonstrate the impact that varying the population of lengths and widths for geologic features has on sand body distribution and interwell continuity.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].