About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin


AAPG Bulletin, V. 98, No. 6 (June 2014), P. 11451159.

Copyright copy2014. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

DOI: 10.1306/11111313009

Time-dependent subsidence associated with drainage-induced compaction in Gulf of Mexico shales bounding a severely depleted gas reservoir

Chandong Chang,1 Ellen Mallman,2 and Mark Zoback3

1Department of Geology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305-764, South Korea; [email protected]
2Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; present address: BP, 1-4 Wellheads Avenue, Dyce, Aberdeen AB21 7PB, UK; [email protected]
3Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; [email protected]


Production from ubiquitous oil and gas fields in coastal Louisiana and consequent reservoir compaction has been proposed as an important process contributing to coastal subsidence and land loss in this region. As revealed by three consecutive leveling surveys (in 1965, 1982, and 1993), an unexpected aspect of the subsidence is that the rate of subsidence actually increased after the cessation of production. To explain the accelerated postdepletion subsidence, we propose a mechanism involving time-dependent drainage and compaction in the overlying and underlying shales after depletion. We show that the shale compaction is induced by slow drainage of pore fluid from the shale to the depleted reservoir. We estimate the significance of postdepletion compaction in the bounding shale using a relatively simple analytic model in which time-dependent shale compaction is driven by pore pressure diffusion with two sets of rheological constitutive equations: one accounting for poroelastic effects and one accounting for viscoplastic deformation of the shale matrix. Our modeling shows that despite its very low permeability, after about 10 years, vertical compaction due to pressure drainage in the shale exceeds that due to depletion and compaction of the sand reservoir. Consequently, the calculated subsidence rate due to the shale compaction is higher than the subsidence induced by reservoir depletion, thus demonstrating that postdepletion compaction in the reservoir-surrounding shale may explain the observed acceleration of subsidence after depletion.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Protected Document: $10
Internal PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].