About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

DOI: 10.1306/0504171620817154

Validating novel boundary conditions for three-dimensional mechanics-based restoration: An extensional sandbox model example

Benjamin P. Chauvin,1 Peter J. Lovely,2 Joseph M. Stockmeyer,3 Andreas Plesch,4 Guillaume Caumon,5 and John H. Shaw6

1GeoRessources, École Nationale Supérieure de Géologie, Université de Lorraine/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Centre de Recherches sur la Géologie des Matières Premières Minérales et Énergétiques, 2 rue du Doyen Marcel Roubault, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; [email protected]
2Integrated Exploration Research Team, Chevron Energy Technology Company, 1500 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002; [email protected]
3Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, 20 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138; present address: Chevron North America Exploration and Production, 1500 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002; [email protected]
4Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, 20 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138; [email protected]
5GeoRessources, École Nationale Supérieure de Géologie, Université de Lorraine/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Centre de Recherches sur la Géologie des Matières Premières Minérales et Énergétiques, 2 rue du Doyen Marcel Roubault, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; [email protected]
6Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, 20 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138; [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Geomechanical restoration methods are dependent on boundary conditions to ensure geological consistency of the restored model in terms of geometry and strain. Classical restoration boundary conditions, such as flattening a datum horizon, may lead to inconsistent displacement and strain fields.

We restore a laboratory structural sandbox model with known deformation history to develop guidelines for definition of boundary conditions that produce improved results from geomechanical restorations. The sandbox model has a basal silicone layer, includes synkinematic deposition, and is characterized by structures analogous to those found in suprasalt extensional environments. The deformed geometry is interpreted from three-dimensional tomography imaging, and a time series of cross section tomography images provides a benchmark to quantify restoration error and inform boundary conditions.

We confirm that imposing a lateral displacement equal and opposite to far-field tectonic shortening or extension provides a more accurate restoration. However, the amount of displacement may not be known in real cases. We therefore test several established methods, using only the unrestored geometries, to assess the amount of shortening that should be used to guide geomechanical restorations. An accurate estimation is provided by the area–depth method and potentially by a dilatation analysis. Additionally, novel fault-compliance boundary conditions produce improved results in the vicinity of crossing and branching faults. Application of similar methods should produce improved restoration of natural geologic structures.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].