About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

DOI: 10.1306/0108181613516519

A comparative study of reservoir modeling techniques and their impact on predicted performance of fluvial-dominated deltaic reservoirs: Discussion

Shengli Li,1 Ye Zhang,2 Y. Zee Ma,3 Christopher Dorion,4 Colin Daly,5 and Tuanfeng Zhang6

1School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), No. 29 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China; [email protected]
2Department of Geology and Geophysics, Department 3006, 1000 East University Avenue, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; [email protected]
3Schlumberger SIS, 1675 Broadway, Suite 900, Denver, Colorado 80202; [email protected]
4Schlumberger SIS, 1675 Broadway, Suite 900, Denver, Colorado; [email protected]
5Abingdon Technology Center, Schlumberger SIS, 1A Forest Walk, London N10 2ER, United Kingdom; [email protected]
6Schlumberger-Doll Research Center, 1 Hampshire Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139; [email protected]

ABSTRACT

We found Deveugle et al.’s comparison of several techniques for modeling the facies of fluvial-dominated deltaic reservoirs particularly interesting. The paper’s main finding confirms the importance of integrating geological concepts into geostatistical modeling to generate realistic reservoir models. Although we think that the paper is quite thorough in its investigation into several geological themes and multidisciplinary integrations, we want to comment on the following two issues.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].