About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Environmental Geosciences (DEG)

Abstract

Environmental Geosciences, V. 12, No. 4 (December 2005), P. 219-233.

DOI:10.1306/eg.06070504052

Innovative technologies and vadose zone treatment of chlorinated volatile organic compounds: Case study

Jay V. Noonkester,1 Ralph L. Nichols,2 Kenneth L. Dixon3

1Savannah River National Laboratory, Savannah River Site, 773-42A, Aiken, South Carolina 29808; [email protected]
2Savannah River National Laboratory, Savannah River Site, 773-42A, Aiken, South Carolina 29808; [email protected]
3Savannah River National Laboratory, Savannah River Site, 773-42A, Aiken, South Carolina 29808; [email protected]

AUTHORS

Jay V. Noonkester completed his B.A. degree in geology and computer science in 1990 from the University of Maine at Farmington. He has 14 years of environmental experience at the Savannah River National Laboratory. His interests include developing, deploying, and testing various characterization and remediation technologies.

Ralph Nichols is a fellow engineer at the Savannah River National Laboratory, where he has conducted research related to soil and groundwater characterization and remediation for 17 years. He received a B.S. degree in geological engineering from the University of Missouri–Rolla and an M.S. degree in civil engineering from the University of Oklahoma. His primary research interests are in the collection and synthesis of data from multiple scales into conceptual models that are used to develop sustainable environmental management strategies.

Kenneth Dixon is a principal engineer at the Savannah River National Laboratory, where he has conducted research related to soil and groundwater characterization and remediation for 14 years. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in agricultural engineering from the University of Georgia and an M.E. degree in civil engineering from the University of South Carolina. His primary research interests are in pilot-scale testing of innovative remedial technologies and numerical modeling of contaminant fate and transport in the vadose zone.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The information contained in this article was developed during the course of work under Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500 with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The authors specifically acknowledge the support of the DOE Environmental Management Program and the Soil and Groundwater Closure Projects. The authors express particular appreciation to Charles Betivas for his tireless efforts to ensure the highest quality of fieldwork throughout the odyssey that is the remediation of CVOCs at TNX. We also recognize the support of Gerald Blount and Dennis Stapleton for their programmatic guidance and contributions to the regulatory strategy to implement this graded approach to remediation.

By acceptance of this document, the publisher and/or recipient acknowledges the U.S. Government's rights to retain a nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright covering this document, along with the right to reproduce and to authorize others to reproduce all or part of the copyright material. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or the Westinghouse Savannah River Company. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or the Westinghouse Savannah River Company and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.

ABSTRACT

Over the last 10 yr, a mix of innovative and conventional characterization techniques has been used to assess the contamination of vadose zone sediments beneath the pilot-scale test facility known as TNX at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina. Shallow soils and groundwater beneath the TNX facility are contaminated with chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs), trichloroethylene (TCE), carbon tetrachloride (CCl4), perchloroethylene (PCE), and chloroform (CHCl3). An interim pump-and-treat remediation system was placed in operation in 1996 to provide hydraulic containment of groundwater containing greater than 500 mug/L dissolved TCE.

In 1994, a vadose zone study was initiated to determine the degree and extent of CVOC contamination above the contaminated groundwater. Headspace sampling and analysis, acoustic infrared spectroscopy, cone penetration testing, and vadose zone pumping tests were used to determine contaminant concentrations and physical properties related to soil vapor extraction (SVE). In 2001, SVE, a presumptive remedy for CVOCs in soils similar to those present beneath TNX, was selected to treat the CVOC contamination. Cone penetration testing with soil vapor sampling provided a detailed understanding of the subsurface geology and CVOC distribution, which was essential for proper well design and placement. Twelve SVE wells were installed using direct push technology and were tested to determine specific capacity and CVOC concentrations. This information was then used to develop a strategy for operating the SVE system. Based on the results of the baseline testing and previous studies, sets of two to three extraction wells will be treated using SVE at 1-month intervals. This will allow continuous operation of the SVE system and give individual wells up to 3 months for rebound between treatments. This method of operation is intended to maximize contaminant recovery from individual wells and reduce the overall capital investment and operating cost of the SVE system.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24