About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Environmental Geosciences (DEG)

Abstract

Environmental Geosciences, V. 14, No. 1 (March 2007), P. 31-48.

Copyright copy2007. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists/Division of Environmental Geosciences. All rights reserved.

DOI:10.1306/eg.01050605014

Geologic and anthropogenic factors influencing karst development in the Previous HitFrederickNext Hit region of Maryland

David K. Brezinski1

1Maryland Geological Survey, 2400 St. Paul Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218; [email protected]

AUTHORS

David K. Brezinski is the Appalachian stratigrapher and paleontologist for the Maryland Geological Survey. His main research interests are carbonate geology and stratigraphy and trilobite systematics. Throughout his 20-year career with the Maryland Geological Survey, he has published more than 100 articles, maps, and abstracts on stratigraphy and paleontology.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was funded, in part, by the Maryland State Highway Administration, through the efforts of A. D. Martin. Earlier versions of this manuscript were greatly improved by suggestions of C. A. Kertis and J. P. Reger. Reviewers J. B. Epstein and W. Kochanov provided valuable suggestions and improvements.

ABSTRACT

Karst features pervade the outcrop belts of Triassic, Ordovician, and Cambrian rocks in the Previous HitFrederickNext Hit Valley region of Maryland's western Piedmont. Detailed stratigraphic analysis and geologic and karst mapping demonstrate that individual stratigraphic units have differing susceptibilities of karst feature creation. Although the Triassic Leesburg Member of the Bull Run Formation and Rocky Springs Station Member of the Cambrian Previous HitFrederickNext Hit Formation have many surface depressions within their outcrop belts, the Lime Kiln Member of the Previous HitFrederickTop Formation and the Ceresville, Fountain Rock, and Woodsboro members of the Ordovician Grove Formation have the greatest potential for development of catastrophic collapse sinkholes. Although these four members have the highest relative susceptibility, human activity can increase the potential for sinkhole activation in all units. Rerouting of surface drainage patterns, unlined drainage, and storm-water management areas and removal of significant overburden deposits significantly increase sinkhole development, but mainly, these units are inherently more susceptible to begin with.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24