About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

GCAGS Transactions

Abstract


Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions
Vol. 41 (1991), Pages 374-382

Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies of Smackover Carbonate Reservoirs in Southwest Alabama

David C. Kopaska-Merkel (1), Steven D. Mann (1)

ABSTRACT

Previous HitPoreNext Hit facies are rock units that are defined by certain proportions of Previous HitporeNext Hit types, contain specific Previous HitporeNext Hit-throat-size distributions, and exhibit certain consequent fluid-flow properties. Previous HitPoreNext Hit facies may contain only one Previous HitporeNext Hit type, but more typically are characterized by a combination of several Previous HitporeNext Hit types. Data used in this study consist of point counts of thin sections that are plotted on ternary diagrams whose apices are Previous HitporeNext Hit types (ternary Previous HitporeNext Hit plots), commercial porosity and permeability data from core analyses, qualitative thin-section descriptions, and qualitative core descriptions.

Two distinct but partially intergrading Previous HitporeNext Hit facies are recognized in the Smackover of southwestern Alabama. These Previous HitporeNext Hit facies are defined based on the two most common Previous HitporeNext Hit types in the Smackover, particle-moldic (including secondary intraparticle) and intercrystalline pores, which together account for greater than 85% of total porosity in the Smackover. Rocks assigned to the Moldic Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies exhibit similar depositional fabrics and experienced similar diagenetic processes. For example, this Previous HitporeNext Hit facies is most commonly composed of peloid and ooid grainstone (some fabric selectively dolomitized), modified by early cementation and particle dissolution. By contrast, in the Intercrystalline Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies, destruction of primary fabrics by nonfabric-selective dolomitization is almost the sole determinant of Previous HitporeNext Hit-Previous HitsystemNext Hit characteristics. The Moldic Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies dominates to the northwest (Choctaw, western Clarke, Washington counties; the updip area) and the Intercrystalline Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies is dominant to the south and east (Mobile, Monroe, Baldwin, Escambia, and Conecuh counties; the downdip area). Previous HitPoreNext Hit facies distributions overlap in some areas (e.g., western Monroe county) indicating that multiple Previous HitporeNext Hit facies occur in many Smackover fields.

The two Previous HitporeNext Hit facies exhibit substantially different petrophysical characteristics. The mean slope of regression lines of porosity on ln (natural log) permeability for the Intercrystalline Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies is 0.47, with a range of 0.19 to 0.90. The mean slope for the Moldic Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies is 0.22 with a range of 0.18 to 0.27. The higher slopes for the Intercrystalline Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies mean that permeability values may be more precisely predicted from porosity data in this Previous HitporeNext Hit facies. The mean maximum permeability for the Intercrystalline Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies is 130 md; the corresponding value is 91 md for the Moldic Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies. High-permeability fluid conduits are more common in the Intercrystalline Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies than in the Moldic Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies. In addition, all high-permeability examples of the Moldic Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies contain substantial amounts of interparticle porosity and are found near the Smackover subcrop. (The remainder of the Moldic Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies is characterized by permeability values substantially less than those of the Intercrystalline Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies.) Porosity values are commonly higher in the Moldic Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies, which has a range of mean porosity of 10.2 to 28.0% compared to 9.6 to 20.5% for the Intercrystalline Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies. Greater hydrocarbon volumes can be stored in reservoirs dominated by the Moldic Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies, but connectivity is better in the Intercrystalline Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies.

Mixtures between the two Previous HitporeNext Hit facies are moderately common. Mixed Previous HitporeNext Hit systems commonly resemble the Intercrys talline Previous HitPoreNext Hit Facies in the slope of the regression line of porosity on ln permeability. In strata with mixed Previous HitporeTop systems, "isolated" particle-moldic pores are commonly connected by networks of intercrystalline pores which control transport of fluids out of particle-moldic pores.


Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24