Abstract

The past several years have seen numerous opinion pieces, editorials, and technical papers regarding climate change in the pages of many publications, both scientific and secular. Although both sides of this now almost religious debate were represented, few if any real facts or data are provided to support the opinions expressed. The public deserves more, and specifically deserves to be informed properly.

The heat content of the atmosphere has remained largely unchanged since 1995. Data prepared and compiled by a number of climate scientists illustrate the wide divergence of climate model projections from what has been occurring (Fig. 1): the climate has not been warming any more than would be expected as the world continues to move out of the Little Ice Age. These data have been accepted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), whose chairperson admits that the climate modeling community does not understand what is happening.

Water vapor in the atmosphere is a more potent greenhouse gas than CO₂ (McIntyre and McKitrick, 2003). Climatologists have understood this for decades and this is a fact clearly expressed in all climatology textbooks. None of the climate models employed today adequately addresses the influence of water vapor.

Cosmic radiation is the source of the particles that cause water droplet nucleation and cloud formation in the upper atmosphere (Laken et al., 2010). Its flux, in turn, is directly influenced by solar activity and the strength of the resulting solar wind. None of the climate models deal with either of these first-order climate influences (Hoyt and Schatten, 1997; D’Aleo, 2013).

The Earth’s atmosphere has had far higher CO₂ content many times and for much of the geologic past, and major glacial events have occurred during those times, most notably during the Carboniferous and Silurian. The inescapable conclusion is that CO₂ has no relationship to the temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere. This is a conclusion that was reached by many scientists who have looked at ice core data and found that increases in CO₂ in the atmosphere occur several hundred years after temperatures have risen—they do not change in lock-step as has been claimed, and an event 800 years in the future cannot impact events today.

These facts allow a number of fictions to be addressed: (1) Polar bears will not become extinct if sea ice diminishes. Polar bears were around before the Medieval Warm Period and came through it just fine. A recently published, peer-review study of the Davis Straights in Canada found that not only had the polar bear population increased dramatically since the 1970s, but that the area may have reached its carrying capacity. Good news for polar bears (Peacock et al., 2013). (2) The evolution which the climate is exhibiting, and which it constantly exhibits, is not causing an increase in violent storms (Fig. 2). The frequency of violent tornados (>F3) is similar (Fig. 3). (3) The changes in climate during the past 100 years have not caused either an increase in flooding or an increase in the number or extent of droughts (Fig. 4). (4) The number of daily record high temperatures is not at an all-time high. For the past 100 years that was reached in the 1930s during the Dust Bowl (Fig. 5). (5) Finally, there is not a consensus among scientists that anthropogenic CO₂ is causing climate change. The widely quoted number of 97% of scientists believing in global warming is based on an on-line survey of 10,257 earth scientists. 3,146 replied and all but 77 were “disqualified” by the researchers conducting the survey. Of those, 75 thought that humans were contributing to climate change, thus the 97% number, one that is not particularly robust.

The conclusions to be drawn from examination of these data are four: (1) All of the scary global warming scenarios are based on computer models. (2) None of the models work. (3) There is and has been no scientific consensus, claims to the contrary notwithstanding (Cook et al., 2013). (4) The data which come from our global experiment—the observations we have made—indicate that the climate is evolving and always has evolved continuously. There are no data indicating that people have caused that change: The contributions humans may make to those changes are lost in the noise of natural variability.

We need to use this information to stop our regulators and legislators from taking steps and passing laws that will have no effect on the climate we enjoy and can only have disastrous impacts on our economy and the welfare of much of mankind.