About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract

Camp, W. K., 2008, Basin-centered gas or subtle conventional traps?, in S. P. Cumella, K. W. Shanley, and W. K. Camp, eds., Understanding, exploring, and developing tight-gas sands—2005 Vail Hedberg Conference: AAPG Hedberg Series, no. 3, p. 49-61.

DOI:10.1306/13131049H33323

Copyright copy2008. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

Basin-centered Gas or Subtle Conventional Traps?

Wayne K. Camp

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, The Woodlands, Texas, U.S.A.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank JEBCO Seismic, L.P., for permission to publish seismic data from the JEBCO nonexclusive SE Jonah 3-D seismic survey; Anadarko Petroleum Corporation for permission to publish this chapter; and current and past colleagues at Anadarko: Thomas Griffith, Lee Shannon, Mark Bacon, Bob Heckman, Pete Coffin, Andrea Brown, Lindsay Poth, and Jerry Wristers. Without their inspired discussions and dedicated work, this chapter would not be possible. I also acknowledge Paul Devine and Lee Shannon for their constructive reviews, which have improved the composition and clarity of this chapter.

ABSTRACT

Basin-centered gas models have been proposed to characterize various low-permeability (tight) sandstone gas plays that are an important gas resource found in many Rocky Mountain basins. Recent drilling and three-dimensional seismic results indicate that modifications are required of the currently accepted basin-centered gas models that were first introduced more than 25 yr ago. Current models of basin-centered gas accumulations depict gas trapped below a relatively uniform, enigmatic pressure seal defined by a given structural elevation or thermal-maturation depth that cuts across stratigraphic boundaries. In the prevailing model, this surface separates normally pressured conventional traps from unconventional traps, which are characterized by anomalous reservoir pressure and lack of associated water production. These principles have led to a commonly held misconception that basinwide, commercial gas deposits may exist below this pressure boundary and, further, to predictions of overstated reserves and overly optimistic drilling success rates.

New studies of several gas plays in tight sandstones from the Greater Green River Basin in southern Wyoming, reviewed in this chapter, suggest that the primary controls for the occurrence of these fields are better explained as conventional, although subtle, stratigraphic and structural traps. Subsurface data are described, which illustrate additional inconsistencies with the prevalent basin-centered gas models, including the presence of downdip water, and natural fracture and stratigraphic variations that influence productivity. These subtle controls have previously been accepted as poorly understood areas of enhanced production or sweet spots. With a revised understanding, geologic methods can be applied to identify areas of improved reservoir quality, thereby increasing the probability of favorable economic development. More importantly, the key to future exploration success in the Rocky Mountain region and other tight-gas sandstone provinces is recognizing that subtle, conventional stratigraphic and structural traps provide controls on commercial gas deposits in these plays.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24