About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract

Chapter from:
AAPG Memoir 67: Seals, Traps, and the Petroleum System, Edited by R. C. Surdam
(Publication Subject: Oil Methodology, Concepts)
AAPG Memoir 67: Seals, Traps, and the Petroleum System. Chapter 6: Evaluating Previous HitSealNext Hit Potential: Example from the Talang Akar Formation, Offshore Northwest Java, Indonesia, by J.G. Kaldi and C.D. Atkinson, p. 85-101

Copyright © 1997 by The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.


Chapter 6

Evaluating Previous HitSealNext Hit Potential: Example from the Talang Akar Formation, Offshore Northwest Java, Indonesia

by

J.G. Kaldi
ARCO Indonesia Jakarta, Indonesia

C.D. Atkinson
ARCO British Ltd. Guildford, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT

The Previous HitsealNext Hit potential of various lithologies in the Upper Oligocene Talang Akar Formation (TAF) is evaluated in the BZZ area of offshore northwest Java. Previous HitSealNext Hit potential comprises (1) Previous HitsealNext Hit capacity (the calculated amount of hydrocarbon column height a lithology can support); (2) Previous HitsealNext Hit geometry (the structural position, Previous HitthicknessNext Hit, and areal extent of the lithology); and (3) Previous HitsealNext Hit integrity (rock mechanical properties such as ductility, compressibility, and propensity for fracturing). Previous HitSealNext Hit capacity is determined by mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) analyses. Previous HitSealNext Hit geometry is derived by integrating seismic data, core, detailed well correlations, regional sedimentological/stratigraphic relationships, and comparisons to known depositional analogs. Previous HitSealNext Hit integrity is evaluated qualitatively by core examination, borehole imaging, and petrographic studies. These three variables were integrated and the totals were "ranked." In the BZZ area, deltaic distributary channel sandstones and delta-front/mouth bar heterolithic sandstones comprise the main reservoirs. Possible seals include prodelta, delta-front, and delta-plain shales; channel abandonment silts; and transgressive shelf carbonates in both the upper and lower TAF. Previous HitSealNext Hit potential is best in the delta-front shales, which have high Previous HitsealNext Hit capacity and are thick, laterally continuous, and very ductile. Previous HitSealNext Hit potential is moderate in the thicker (upper TAF) transgressive carbonates. These rocks have high Previous HitsealNext Hit capacity and excellent lateral continuity, but are brittle and, hence, prone to fracturing. Delta-plain shales and prodelta shales are poor seals due to their limited Previous HitsealNext Hit capacity (delta-plain) or because they are too thin (prodelta shales). Channel abandonment siltstones have even poorer Previous HitsealNext Hit potential because of small lateral extent and limited Previous HitsealNext Hit capacity. The least favorable Previous HitsealTop potential occurs within the thin (lower TAF) carbonates. These rocks are relatively thin, as well as being prone to fractures.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24