About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: A Geologist Discusses Depletion *
by
*Paper presented before the Society, October 1959.
Landowners maintain adverse possession of their real property
insofar as the length and breadth of their land surface is surveyed and
fenced. But geologically real property has a third dimension, the vertical
which extends downward to the center of the earth, almost 4,000
miles. If held aloft it would be like a plug cut in a watermelon from
which we could bite off its valuable contents and discard the undesirable
parts. By means of shafts and wells the extractive, mining industries
obtain the earth's valuable contents such as tile and cement, coal, salt,
oil
and
gas
, iron, aluminum and gold. Centuries ago in early English
law these were established as capital assets and belonged with the title
to the land.
Landowners today (jointly with any mineral interest
owners
) grant
oil
and
gas
leases and usually retain ownership of 12 1/2 percent of
oil
and
gas
produced, saved and sold. The lessee (jointly with overriding
royalty interest
owners
) owns usually the 87 1/2 percent of
oil
and
gas
produced, saved and sold after bearing all cost and expense. Both
lessor and lessee comprise the petroleum producer. Forty years ago
the Supreme Court decision stated "... the sale of
oil
results in reduction
of a capital asset and ... this reduction must be considered in
computing taxable income just as the cost of raw material must be
deducted from gross income before the net income can be determined."
The owner of any interest whatsoever in real property to which
oil
and
gas
production and sale is attributable, is liable to declare the tax
he owes on his share, division or fraction of the sales value accruing
during his taxable year. Legality of depletion was established by the
Supreme Court decision aforementioned. In 1918, a federal statute
provided that depletion could be based upon a fair market value of a
newly discovered pool instead of its actual cost. In 1926, after the
Treasury Department had learned it was too difficult to pass on a fair
discovery value rapidly enough to collect income taxes annually, another
federal statute provided that 27% percent of annual sales value of
oil
and
gas
could be deducted but not to exceed 50 percent of the net income
in lieu of establishing the fair market value of the newly discovered
pool. The 1926 Act re-confirmed the intent of the 1918 Act,
and alleviated work in computing tax returns so the tax could be collected
annually.
Legality of depreciation had its origin in a federal statute in 1909, which provided "... a reasonable allowance for depreciation of property." However, a Supreme Court decision prevented a group of mining companies from recovering taxes paid on ore sold from their properties because, as decided by the Court, "in no accurate sense can such exhaustion of the body of ore be deemed depreciation."
Gordon Jones, C. P. A., has ably presented the accounting theory
by which the sales value of real property has to be taxed only on the
basis of capital gain and loss. (In Great Britain capital gain cannot be
taxed.) He calls attention to the fact that
oil
sold at the stock tanks and
gas
at the casinghead is completely real property the same as when
oil
and
gas
are sold in the ground (when an entire property's title is transferred
on the county records.) He cites a former Internal Revenue
Service reviewing engineer's paper establishing 33-1/3 percent of
oil
and
gas
sales value as a reasonable and proper deduction on account of
depletion. Jones advocates treating all capital gain on one common
basis, deducting 50 percent of capital gain plus all capital loss, on account
of depletion.
Depletion is legally established in America, going back to 1909. And in accounting theory depletion was established centuries before an income tax was imposed on the nation. Depletion goes with the title to the land; it is a part of property rights which landowners must learn before their rights are usurped and confiscated. Corporations and associations cannot vote; only through civic minded efforts as individuals can we preserve our property rights given to us proudly but with great sacrifice by our forefathers.
