About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: The South Copano Bay Field Aransas County, Texas
By
An extensive province of Upper and Middle Frio production exists along the
Gulf Coast of Texas, and in this province the Melbourne sand is one of the
prime reservoirs for oil and gas.
Melbourne production in Matagorda and Calhoun Counties is trapped primarily
in closures against the upthrown side of down-to-the-coast faults. In contrast,
anticlinal closures, located on the downthrown side of down-to-the-coast faults,
form the primary traps through Aransas, San Patricio and Nueces Counties.
A case history of the South Copano Bay field, illustrates basic exploration
techniques that are useful in exploring for buried depositional type structures.
INTRODUCTION
The South Copano Bay field, located in Aransas and Refugio Counties, Texas,
is an anticlinal feature traversed by depositional down-to-the-coast faults. Production
has been established in Upper, Middle, and Lower Frio sands from five
distinct fault blocks. Regionally the field is in a fairway of Melbourne production
which the writer has traced from Wadsworth field in Matagorda County, south-,
west to the West Corpus Christi Bay field in Nueces County, a distance of
approximately one hundred and twenty five miles.
The Melbourne sand, better known as the "K-2" in the Corpus Christi area,
is Oligocene (Nonion struma) in age and is considered to be the top of the Middle
Frio section. This paper discusses 1) the relationship of South Copano Bay field
to the Melbourne trend, 2) the history behind the fields discovery, and 3) early
production history of the field. End_of_Record - Last_Page 26-------------- 1Cities Service Oil Company, San Antonio, Texas.
The writer wishes to express his thanks to the Cities Service Oil Company for
permission to publish this paper. My appreciation is extended to Mr. Joseph J.
Marty, Mr. Joseph R. Finerty, Mr. Robert J. Schrock and Mr. Richard L. Beh
for their views and critical analysis of this paper. The author also wishes to
thank Miss Virginia Pool for preparing the enclosed illustrations.