About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Fuel
Options of the Future - Fossil Fuel Versus
the Burning of Wood
By
For the past 40 years it has been recognized that the
carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere is increasing
and has increased at least 10% since 1900. The combustion
of fossil fuels produced more than enough carbon
dioxide to cause this observed increase. The Office of
Carbon Dioxide Effects Research and Assessment of the
Department of Energy estimates [sic] an annual budget of
between 2 to 16 million dollars to gain some understanding
of the problems involved. Proponents of nuclear
energy have suggested that the effects of atmospheric
carbon dioxide build-up from increased coal combustion
are less understood and potentially more dangerous to
mankind than the waste product and by-product problems
of nuclear energy. The carbon dioxide content of the
atmosphere is rapidly increasing (from a trace constituent)
toward a point where major climatic changes may be
postulated to occur. An overall increase in temperature at
the surface of the earth will probably enlarge the arid
regions of the earth and reduce, worldwide, the areas
available for agriculture. The complexities and uncertainties
in the carbon dioxide cycle allow a wide range of
hypotheses; as well as hypothesis piled upon hypothesis
to make a scenario.
Among many possible scenarios, it cannot be disproved
that:
1) wood combustion has been more important than fossil
fuel combustion because most of the people in the world
burn wood for cooking and process heat at the rate of
over one metric ton per capita per year. Large scale forest
clearing for agricultural purposes contributes even more
to the depletion of the cellulose reservoir of the earth.
2) the atmospheric carbon dioxide content is primarily
controlled by the total amount of photosynthesis, which
has fallen behind in cellulose formation as compared to
cellulose combustion
3) the most prudent and feasible public policy for environmental
and aesthetical reasons is to initiate an orderly but
massive reforestation program worldwide. End_of_Record - Last_Page 3---------------