About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Critical Review: Maturation Criteria Utilized
in the Evaluation of Source Rocks
By
The interrelationships between petroleum and source
rocks can be understood only if the important geochemical
and geological data of both systems are known and correctly
interpreted. In evaluating suspected source rocks, the geochemist
has primarily focused attention on the organic richness (quality), organic matter type (gas, condensate or oil
prone) and state of thermal maturity of the organic matter within these rocks. Various
geochemical techniques have
been proposed and accepted over the years to define organic richness, matter
type and maturity. However, there have been questions and apparent contradictions in the industry primarily
with establishing the thermal maturity of various
source rocks. The geochemical data have been, in most
cases, correct; unfortunately, the available geological data
have often not been properly utilized to construct a valid geochemical/geological interpretation. A critical review will be presented of various maturation
criteria which are generally utilized in source rock evaluation studies, and the
pitfalls which can trap the unwary if the geological data are not properly incorporated into the final
maturity interpretation. Maturity may be defined by the color
of dispersed organic matter (kerogen) viewed in transmitted
light and/or by the vitrinite reflectance technique, which compares the
reflectivity of the maceral vitrinite with a scale
based on coal rank. Any change in the level of maturation
caused by an increase in geothermal history (time-temperature) results in a corresponding change in color of
the dispersed kerogen and by changes in reflectivity (Ro) of
polished faces of the vitrinite materials.
This review will show that identical samples of rock can
produce "kerogen" and "vitrinite" data which can be (mis) interpreted
several ways, because the compounding geological
data have not been properly utilized. End_of_Record - Last_Page 3---------------