About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Houston Geological Society Bulletin

Abstract


Houston Geological Society Bulletin, Volume 32, No. 3, November 1989. Pages 7-7.

Abstract: A Case History of Velocity Problems in the Shadow of a Large Growth Fault in the Frio Formation, Texas Gulf Coast

By

James L. Allen and J. M. Bruso, Jr.

False structure can appear on Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit in the shadow of normal growth faults, with the upthrown time structure appearing to roll into the fault where no such roll exists in depth. This phenomenon was encountered in a prospect in the Frio formation of the Texas Gulf Coast, where a large growth fault expanded a thick, low-velocity shale above the Frio. Two check-shot velocity surveys, one at either end of the Previous HitseismicNext Hit control, demonstrated a severe average velocity gradient across the prospect at the level of the objective geologic formation.

Assuming first one and then the other velocity survey was valid over the entire area for conversion of well Previous HitdataNext Hit to time produced a drastic difference in the structural interpretations of the Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit. The more obvious Previous HitinterpretationNext Hit required a down-to-the-northwest fault with a downthrown rollover anticline at the objective formation. This Previous HitinterpretationNext Hit had been previously tested with a dry hole on the crest of the time structure. This Previous HitinterpretationNext Hit also contradicted a dipmeter in this "crestal" well.

Using a model derived from interval velocities from the nearby check-shot surveys, we were able to demonstrate that over 200 ms of apparent Previous HitseismicNext Hit dip in the shadow of the growth fault was false. When we used stacking velocities to perform a depth conversion of the Previous HitseismicTop time section, both the apparent dip direction of the formation and interpreted throw direction of the fault were reversed. Based on these results, a well was drilled which demonstrated the qualitative success of our model. We also discovered that minor buried faulting mapped behind the major fault was a false effect caused by velocity contrasts across the growth fault.

This case history proves that the recognition and proper use of velocity gradients can be extremely important in the Gulf Coast.

End_of_Record - Last_Page 7---------------

 

Copyright © 2005 by Houston Geological Society. All rights reserved.