About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Eustatic and Salt-Tectonic Controls
on Sequence Development,
Northern East Texas Basin
By
Detailed log and seismic interpretation of the
Woodbine/Eagle Ford interval in the vicinity of the Hainesville
Dome of east Texas resulted in the recognition of
salt-tectonic and eustatic controls on depositional patterns.
Major cycles of transgression and regression within this
interval correspond to eustatic cycles recognized worldwide.
The Late Cenomanian lowstand resulted in the
deposition of fluvial Woodbine sandstones above the
marine
Maness Shale (93 Ma). Transgressive and highstand
marine
shales of the Eagle Ford rest above the fluvial Woodbine
sands. A Late Turonian sequence boundary (90 Ma)
separates the highstand shales of the Eagle Ford from the
lowstand and transgressive
marine
sands and shales of the
Sub-Clarksville. The section is capped by the transgressive
Austin Chalk. Between the Woodbine (92 Ma) and the
Sub-Clarksville (90 Ma), the Hainesville Salt Dome evolved
from a nonpiercement to a piercement salt dome. This
evolution of the Hainesville dome caused the area adjacent
to the present-day dome to change from a structural high to
a rapidly subsiding basin adjacent to the dome. With the
rapid loss of salt into the piercement dome around 92 Ma,
conditions adjacent to the dome changed from subaerial
onlapping of the Woodbine fluvial facies to distal downlapping
of the Eagle Ford
marine
shales into the center of the
Hainesville withdrawal syncline. Thus, the detailed timing of
salt movement is recorded in the thickness and facies
distribution around the salt dome within the context of
major global eustatic cycles.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 11---------------