About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Deep-Water Field Development of
Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in
Plio-Pleistocene Turbidite Sands,
East
Breaks
Block 165, Gulf of Mexico
East
Breaks
Block 165, Gulf of MexicoBy
The stratigraphic and structural complexity of the Plio-
Pleistocene section in the
East
Block 165 field is readily
demonstrated after the completion of exploration and
development drilling. Two main problems recurring during
field development involved: 1) prediction of turbidite sand
facies distribution and thickness, and 2) identification of
fault offsets in the highly variable reservoir sands. Well
control and a 3-D seismic data set provided the basis for
reservoir description and an intra-slope basin turbidite sand
depositional model for the
East
Breaks
165 area.
Four main productive sand intervals were encountered in the Plio-Pleistocene section: 1) the GF (Glob. flexuosa) sands, 2) the TA (Trimosina "A") sands, 3) the GM (Glob. miocenica) sands, and 4) the GA (Glob. altispira) sands. All the sands were deposited within an upper slope intra-slope basin. Approximately 85% of the EB 165 field reserves are contained in GA sand reservoirs.
All reservoir sands are characterized by rapid lateral thickness and/or facies changes. Sand packages are composed of both clean channel facies and fining-upward to muddy channel levee and overbank facies. Variable sand thicknesses resulted from: 1) the non-uniform lateral migration of turbidite channel systems across the basin, and 2) lateral changes from clean channel facies to silt and mud-prone inter-channel deposits. Facies changes in localized areas within the channel systems resulted in the formation of stratigraphic traps.
The main reservoir trap is an anticlinal closure formed downthrown to two regional-scale northeast-trending extensional faults. Numerous small-scale faults which offset the anticlinal crestal area added considerable complexity to the field development. The faulting resulted from the growth and subsequent collapse of a salt-cored anticlinal ridge. Timing of maximum structural relief along the anticlinal ridge is inferred from log and seismic evidence which indicate that 800-1000' of section representing the Aftonian and Kansan stages is missing the crestal area of the EB 165 structure.
Recognition of the complex structural environment
and the development of a turbidite channel and channel
levee/overbank depositional model has been important in
delineating future recomplition and development drilling
targets in the
East
Breaks
165 field. The stratigraphic
models developed for this area may also prove to be useful
analogs for exploration and development programs in other
Gulf of Mexico intra-slope basins.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 12---------------