About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Lower-Middle Wolfcampian Sequence
Stratigraphy of the
Eastern Central Basin Platform, Texas
By
Wolfcampian-age reservoirs have produced in excess of 250 million barrels of oil from numerous fields peripheral to the Midland Basin of West Texas. The vast majority of this production is located along the eastern margin of the Central Basin Platform. The results of this sequence stratigraphic study of a portion of the eastern Central Basin Platform indicates that significant potential remains for substantial oil accumulations in Wolfcampian carbonate reservoirs in this region. This study has developed the criteria for seismic delineation of 1) subtle stratigraphic traps at porosity pinchouts; and 2) complex reservoir geometries within existing Wolfcamp fields which can result in significant reserve additions through infill drilling, extension wells and new field exploratory discoveries. Along the eastern Central Basin Platform, Wolfcamp fields produce from a wide variety of carbonate reservoir facies including skeletal-nonskeletal grainstones, algal mounds, and dolomitized high-angle platform margin bank facies. Additionally, detrital accumulations such as basin slope grainflow accumulations, submarine fans, debris flows and mega-slide blocks comprise locally significant reservoirs.
Sequence stratigraphic interpretation of the platform
to basin transition reveals stratal geometries not readily
interpretable from well log and
biostratigraphic
data alone.
Interpretation of various seismic data sources including
high-fold and high-resolution data aided and constrained by
biostratigraphic
, well log and facies interpretation reveals a
complex evolution of the Early Pennsylvanian (Morrowan)
to Early Permian (Leonardian) margins of the Central Basin
Platform. This morphological evolution involved early Pennsylvanian
onlap of the incipient Central Basin Platform
followed by Middle Pennsylvanian progradation. Subsequent
backstep of prograding Late Pennsylvanian platform
margins was followed by continued progradation through
Middle Wolfcampian time. Renewed backstep of prograding
Late Wolfcampian platform margins was followed again by
extensive progradation in early Leonardian time. This
platform margin evolution resulted in approximately 12 km
of net progradation from early Pennsylvanian to late Wolfcampian
time in the study area.
In the Wolfcamp section, high-resolution and to a lesser degree, high-fold seismic data, resolves the subtle transition from platform interior to platform margin facies, and assists with mapping of sequence boundaries, systems tracts and prediction of reservoir facies distribution as well as stratigraphic trap geometry. The diagnostic seismic signature of Wolfcampian platform interior facies consists of high-amplitude, continuous parallel reflections characteristic of interbedded variegated shale and lime mud-rich, upward-shoaling peritidal facies. The seismic signature of the platform margin facies is characterized by subtle, low amplitude, discontinuous mounded to low-angle oblique reflections. The low-angle oblique reflections are interpreted as progradational carbonate bank facies as identified from well cuttings, cores and wire-line logs. Platform margin lithofacies are characterized by upward-shoaling sequences interbedded with minor gray to green marine shale. Platform margin parasequences consist of basal phylloid algal-peloidal wackestone grading upward to mixed skeletal-nonskeletal packstone, which is capped by peloidal-skeletal to oolitic packstone-grainstone. In situ and allochthonous skeletal to oolitic grainstones comprise the reservoir facies in many Wolfcampian fields in the study area.
Third-order lowstand systems tracts are not developed
on the platform margin in the study area, though unequivocal
evidence for lowstand detrital accumulations exist
elsewhere marginal to the Central Basin Platform. Transgressive
systems tracts overlie third-order sequence
boundaries and are characteristically very thin, commonly
less than 15 m thick. Marine flooding surfaces are not well
developed in the study area within the Lower-Middle
Wolfcampian interval, but are very well exhibited in the
Upper Wolfcampian interval. Highstand systems tract facies
comprise the majority of the third-order sequence accumulations
on the platform margin. Highstand systems tracts
are commonly 30-40 m in thickness, consisting of stacked,
upward-shoaling, grainstone-rich progradational parasequences.
Third-order sequence boundaries are typically
subtle in appearance in core and well cuttings. Thus, use of
biostratigraphic
zonation and geometric relationships
observable in seismic (onlap, toplap and truncation) are
generally necessary to identify these important surfaces.
In summary, a fully integrated approach to sequence
stratigraphic study of low angle carbonate platform margins
is essential to development of the sequence framework from
which predictions of reservoir distribution, type and occurrence
can be made with greater confidence. This study has
demonstrated that high-resolution seismic interpretation in
conjunction with lithofacies and
biostratigraphic
analyses:
1) identifies stratigraphic trap relationships within low angle,
prograding carbonate platform margin facies; 2) has defined
the criteria for recognition of the seismic expression of
depositional facies which have implications for reservoir
facies occurrence; 3) explains reservoir porosity and production
heterogeneities within existing fields by defining
internal reservoir geometry; and 4) facilitates more accurate
prediction of reservoir facies distribution and trap style in
new field exploratory areas.
End_Pages 12 and 32---------------