About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Lower-Middle Wolfcampian Sequence
Stratigraphy of the
Eastern Central Basin Platform, Texas
By
Wolfcampian-age reservoirs have produced in excess
of 250 million barrels of oil from numerous fields peripheral
to the Midland Basin of West Texas. The vast majority of
this production is located along the eastern margin of the
Central Basin Platform. The results of this sequence
stratigraphic study of a portion of the eastern Central Basin
Platform indicates that significant potential remains for
substantial oil accumulations in Wolfcampian carbonate
reservoirs in this region. This study has developed the
criteria for
seismic
delineation of 1) subtle stratigraphic
traps at porosity pinchouts; and 2) complex reservoir
geometries within existing Wolfcamp fields which can result
in significant reserve additions through infill drilling, extension
wells and new field exploratory discoveries. Along
the eastern Central Basin Platform, Wolfcamp fields produce
from a wide variety of carbonate reservoir
facies
including skeletal-nonskeletal grainstones, algal mounds,
and dolomitized high-angle platform margin bank
facies
.
Additionally, detrital accumulations such as basin slope
grainflow accumulations, submarine fans, debris flows and
mega-slide blocks comprise locally significant reservoirs.
Sequence stratigraphic interpretation of the platform
to basin transition reveals stratal geometries not readily
interpretable from well log and biostratigraphic data alone.
Interpretation of various
seismic
data sources including
high-fold and high-resolution data aided and constrained by
biostratigraphic, well log and
facies
interpretation reveals a
complex evolution of the Early Pennsylvanian (Morrowan)
to Early Permian (Leonardian) margins of the Central Basin
Platform. This morphological evolution involved early Pennsylvanian
onlap of the incipient Central Basin Platform
followed by Middle Pennsylvanian progradation. Subsequent
backstep of prograding Late Pennsylvanian platform
margins was followed by continued progradation through
Middle Wolfcampian time. Renewed backstep of prograding
Late Wolfcampian platform margins was followed again by
extensive progradation in early Leonardian time. This
platform margin evolution resulted in approximately 12 km
of net progradation from early Pennsylvanian to late Wolfcampian
time in the study area.
In the Wolfcamp section, high-resolution and to a lesser
degree, high-fold
seismic
data, resolves the subtle transition
from platform interior to platform margin
facies
, and assists
with
mapping
of sequence boundaries, systems tracts and
prediction of reservoir
facies
distribution as well as stratigraphic
trap geometry. The diagnostic
seismic
signature of
Wolfcampian platform interior
facies
consists of high-amplitude,
continuous parallel reflections characteristic of
interbedded variegated shale and lime mud-rich, upward-shoaling
peritidal
facies
. The
seismic
signature of the
platform margin
facies
is characterized by subtle, low
amplitude, discontinuous mounded to low-angle oblique
reflections. The low-angle oblique reflections are interpreted
as progradational carbonate bank
facies
as identified from
well cuttings, cores and wire-line logs. Platform margin
lithofacies are characterized by upward-shoaling sequences
interbedded with minor gray to green marine shale. Platform
margin parasequences consist of basal phylloid algal-peloidal
wackestone grading upward to mixed skeletal-nonskeletal
packstone, which is capped by peloidal-skeletal to oolitic
packstone-grainstone. In situ and allochthonous skeletal to
oolitic grainstones comprise the reservoir
facies
in many
Wolfcampian fields in the study area.
Third-order lowstand systems tracts are not developed
on the platform margin in the study area, though unequivocal
evidence for lowstand detrital accumulations exist
elsewhere marginal to the Central Basin Platform. Transgressive
systems tracts overlie third-order sequence
boundaries and are characteristically very thin, commonly
less than 15 m thick. Marine flooding surfaces are not well
developed in the study area within the Lower-Middle
Wolfcampian interval, but are very well exhibited in the
Upper Wolfcampian interval. Highstand systems tract
facies
comprise the majority of the third-order sequence accumulations
on the platform margin. Highstand systems tracts
are commonly 30-40 m in thickness, consisting of stacked,
upward-shoaling, grainstone-rich progradational parasequences.
Third-order sequence boundaries are typically
subtle in appearance in core and well cuttings. Thus, use of
biostratigraphic zonation and geometric relationships
observable in
seismic
(onlap, toplap and truncation) are
generally necessary to identify these important surfaces.
In summary, a fully integrated approach to sequence
stratigraphic study of low angle carbonate platform margins
is essential to development of the sequence framework from
which predictions of reservoir distribution, type and occurrence
can be made with greater confidence. This study has
demonstrated that high-resolution
seismic
interpretation in
conjunction with lithofacies and biostratigraphic analyses:
1) identifies stratigraphic trap relationships within low angle,
prograding carbonate platform margin
facies
; 2) has defined
the criteria for recognition of the
seismic
expression of
depositional
facies
which have implications for reservoir
facies
occurrence; 3) explains reservoir porosity and production
heterogeneities within existing fields by defining
internal reservoir geometry; and 4) facilitates more accurate
prediction of reservoir
facies
distribution and trap style in
new field exploratory areas.
End_Pages 12 and 32---------------