About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Houston Geological Society Bulletin

Abstract


Houston Geological Society Bulletin, Volume 36, No. 7, March 1994. Pages 9-9.

Abstract: The Significance of Textural, Compositional, and Previous HitDiageneticNext Hit Interaction on Porosity Development in Gulf Coast and Other Reservoir Sandstones

By

Dick Larese

Porosity development in reservoir sandstones is greatly influenced by Previous HitdiageneticNext Hit Previous HitprocessesNext Hit which characteristically are programmed by pre-burial conditions of depositional facies and framework composition. Textural and mineralogical characteristics can have a great impact on discrete chemical and physical Previous HitdiageneticNext Hit Previous HitprocessesNext Hit affecting the sand body. Commonly, these effects (e.g., cementation, compaction) result in considerable modification of pore space in part or all of the sequence and significantly influence exploration and exploitation strategy.

Depositional Factors including lithology, sedimentary structures, and texture (mainly grain size, sorting) have had a pronounced effect on porosity development in Gulf Coast and other sandstones. Commonly, discrete Previous HitdiageneticNext Hit Previous HitprocessesNext Hit are segregated within Previous HitsandstoneNext Hit sequences on the basis of grain size trends attributed to variation in depositional energy. In lower Miocene (offshore Texas) and Jurassic Norphlet (offshore Alabama) sandstones, physical and chemical compaction effects are most pronounced in finer-grained facies resulting in irreversible porosity loss. Chemical compaction (pressure solution) Previous HitprocessesNext Hit in these intervals likely provided an in situ source of silica and carbonate cement which selectively precipitated in adjacent/nearby coarser-grained Previous HitsandstoneNext Hit intervals. In addition, pressure solution effects on grain and stylolitic scale along argillaceous/organic bed laminae may result in the development of effective barriers to vertical fluid flow in sandstones (e.g., Nubia, Gulf of Suez).

Mineralogical composition of reservoir sandstones is extremely critical to effective porosity development, as framework grains of contrasting composition behave differently with burial diagenesis. Labile lithic fragments (volcanic, metamorphic, sedimentary) may be subjected to significant physical compaction by ductile grain deformation. The degree of porosity reduction by this mechanism is governed by the type, abundance, and distribution heterogeneity of lithic components within the depositional environment. In contrast, the alteration of particular types of framework components may aid in porosity preservation or enhancement within a Previous HitsandstoneNext Hit sequence. The selective dissolution of detrital feldspar in lower Miocene sandstones from Matagorda Island (offshore Texas) accounts for up to 30% of total effective porosity. Correspondingly, Previous HitdiageneticNext Hit alteration of minor amounts of volcanic detritus (3-8 volume percent) in several Tuscaloosa Previous HitSandstoneNext Hit intervals (upper Cretaceous, Louisiana) has resulted in the development of authigenic chlorite coatings (5-13 volume percent) which have preserved primary intergranular interstices by inhibiting the precipitation of quartz cement. Principal pre-burial controls on Previous HitsandstoneNext Hit composition include provenance, transportation, and mineral partitioning within the depositional environment. In sedimentary basins possessing a common sediment source, the concentration of framework components due to variations in size, shape and density can result in significant differences in the intensity of Previous HitdiageneticNext Hit reactions and ultimately, porosity distribution within a Previous HitsandstoneTop sequence.

End_of_Record - Last_Page 9---------------

 

Copyright © 2005 by Houston Geological Society. All rights reserved.