About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Houston Geological Society Bulletin

Abstract


Houston Geological Society Bulletin, Volume 37, No. 6, February 1995. Pages 12-12.

Abstract: Cross-well Seismic Previous HitReservoirNext Hit Previous HitCharacterizationNext Hit and Previous HitMonitoringNext Hit

By

M. E. Mathisen, J. H. Justice*, A. A. Vassiliou**, P. S. Cunningham, and J. Shaw
Mobil Research and Development Corp. Dallas, Texas
* Previous HitAdvancedNext Hit Previous HitReservoirNext Hit Technologies, Dallas, Texas
** Amoco Production Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma

Recent cross-well seismic interpretation case studies indicate that seismic tomograms and high resolution reflection images can be used to quantitatively characterize and monitor reservoirs. The cross-well area/volume of numerous Oklahoma and West Texas carbonate and clastic reservoirs has been characterized using baseline cross-well seismic surveys and interdisciplinary interpretation based on geoscience/ engineering data and Previous HitreservoirNext Hit models. Results define the cross-well structure, stratigraphy Previous HitreservoirNext Hit versus nonreservoir facies, high-porosity zones, and fluid type and distribution. The time-lapse interpretation of twenty-seven cross-well seismic surveys acquired during a 3.5-month period across a California heavy oil sand steamflood indicates that cross-well seismic tomograms can be used to monitor the thermal recovery process. S-wave tomograms, which define Previous HitreservoirNext Hit structure, lithofacies, and porosity, do not change with time. The time-lapse P-wave tomograms, in contrast, define several areas where velocity decreased a small amount during an injection cycle and a larger amount after the injectors were shut in. These areas have been affected by the increasing temperature, formation of gas, and pressure changes due to the steam injection process. Application of the cross-well seismic Previous HitreservoirNext Hit Previous HitcharacterizationNext Hit and Previous HitmonitoringNext Hit results during operations should help optimize the location of infill wells, injection intervals, and completions. Improvements in acquisition tools, which have reduced acquisition time to as short as two hours, have helped minimize the impact on field operations and reduce costs. These developments suggest that cross-well seismic Previous HittechnologyNext Hit has the potential to develop into a cost-efficient Previous HittechnologyNext Hit for selected Previous HitreservoirTop management applications.

End_of_Record - Last_Page 12---------------

 

Copyright © 2005 by Houston Geological Society. All rights reserved.