About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Watching It Work: A Demonstration of the Effects of
Lognormality on the Exploration Portfolio
By
Telegraph Exploration, Inc., Austin, Texas
By actually witnessing the simulation and outcome of a 20-well model exploration portfolio, geoscientists and their managers can grasp the scope and implications of the lognormal distribution of prospect reserves and chance of success.
Most knowledgeable explorationists (and some of their managers) now accept the principle that prospect reserves distributions are lognormal, reflecting natural processes of multiplication (acres x average net pay; feet x HC-recovery; bbs/acre-foot). Accordingly, the distribution of most corporate "balanced" portfolios is also approximately lognormal.
What is remarkable is that many corporate officers and high-level exploration managers have not grasped the implications of this principle as it impacts magnitudes and timeframes of corporate exploration results. In particular, they do not seem to understand the expected natural pattern of annual portfolio outcomes: frequent mediocre annual results punctuated occasionally by exceptionally good y m and bad years. It will be demonstrated that such fluctuations may have nothing whatsoever to do with geotechnical or management skill. Rather they are the natural consequence of repeated sampling from natural lognormal prospect reserves distributions. Moreover, statistical tests can distinguish good or bad luck from predictive bias.
A common result of management's ignorance of the lognormal principle is continual and excessive management reorganization of ongoing exploration programs in the well-intentioned but mistaken belief that such "tweaking" will improve year-to-year exploration results. Exploration is inherently a sustained long-term process plagued by short-term interferences. There are indeed effective criteria by which exploration performance can be judged, distinguishing luck from skill. However, annual discovery rate is not an effective criterion unless the portfolio contains about 100 trials or more. Accordingly, assessing exploration performance may require one to more than five years, depending on the size and aggressiveness of the firm.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 8---------------