About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Houston Geological Society Bulletin

Abstract


Houston Geological Society Bulletin, Volume 40, No. 1, September 1997. Pages 11-11.

Abstract: Using Technology for E&P Success – The Practices of Leader Companies in Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, E&P Strategies, and Potential Applications to Other Basins

By

George Eynon
Ziff Energy Group, Calgary

The western Canadian E&P industry has evolved considerably since the oil price shock of 1986 and the gas price shock of 1990-1992. Early adjustments focused on reducing G&A and are mainly complete. The second phase, beginning in the early 1990s, has an operating emphasis. The primary goal is to meet owners' expectations, whether those owners are public (stock market) or private (parent company).

In evaluating how the industry is doing and how we measure success, Ziff Energy has examined, among other things, one of the major critical E&P success factors (CSF)-technology utilization. This analysis compares the performances of the "leaders" in broadly defined Previous HitexplorationNext Hit and production strategies in the western Canada sedimentary basin (WCSB). By our definition, the leaders are those companies that [a] more than replace reserves produced in their chosen strategies, and [b] have a cost of finding and development that is less than the value of the product (that is, are adding value). Parallels to various U.S. basins are evident.

While all leader companies recognize effective use of technology as a CSF in achieving low finding and development costs and high reserves and production replacement rates, not all strategies require the same technology applications and not all companies within a strategy approach Previous HitexplorationNext Hit and production in the same fashion. What technologies help create a real competitive advantage in various oil and gas strategies? Through data questionnaires and personal interviews with executives, we identify technology utilization practices in the various strategy areas and correlate them with finding and development cost and reserve replacement benchmarking performance by both the leaders and losers.

Four significant themes emerge from the leaders. First, the leaders use only appropriate technologies and know when not to use those that cost too much. Second, they employ off-the-shelf technologies, rather than develop new ones themselves. Third, they provide effective dissemination of technology throughout their organizations. Finally, and most importantly, the successful companies expect the technologies to help staff do the basics well, but also demand the use of considerable art and experience in the process.

The study identifies technologies that create a competitive advantage for the leaders in various WCSB E&P strategies. Our Previous HitinnovativeTop graphical presentation clearly shows what the leaders do in each of the strategy areas, compared with the rest of the industry, and indicates the technologies that help create their success. WCSB results are relevant to E&P strategies in a wide variety of other basins and form an integral part of Ziff Energy's upcoming series of finding and development cost performance analysis of U.S. regions.

End_of_Record - Last_Page 11---------------

 

Copyright © 2005 by Houston Geological Society. All rights reserved.