About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Predicting Structural Trap Geometries
in Overthrust Belts
By
ARCO Exploration and
Production Technology, Plano, TX
Trap-forming
structures in
overthrust belts are
commonly characterized
by structural
complexity and poor
seismic
data quality.
Therefore,
seismic
data is usually insufficient
to constrain
the location and size
of potential structural traps. Geologic and
geophysical data, when combined with
structural
modeling
and balanced cross
section techniques can improve structural
interpretations and thereby reduce trap risk
for prospective structures.
Predictive models for interpreting structural styles must incorporate key geometric and kinematic characteristics observed in well-constrained surface and subsurface structures. Mechanical contrasts of key lithotectonic units play an important role in determining the type and geometry of fold-fault relationships, such as fault-bend, fault-propagation, and detachment folds. Lithotectonic packages with strong competency contrasts, such as thick carbonate units encased within thin shale units, result in fault-bend folds and duplexes. Examples of this structural style are found in the Sawtooth Range in Montana, the Canadian Foothills and the Southern Appalachians. Moderate to low competency contrasts, such as interlayered, thin-bedded sandstones characterized by high flexural slip efficiency, result in fault-propagation folds. Examples of these styles are found in the Polish and Romanian Carpathians. Overthrust belts characterized by relatively competent packages overlying weak shales or salt typically result in disharmonic, detachment folds with related accommodation faults. Examples of this style are found in the Dinaride, Zagros, and Jura fold belts.
Delineation of deep anticlinal traps typically involves the extrapolation of surface and near-surface geometries to deeper horizons. Trap risks are related to changes in the geometry, location, and size of structures with depth. The relationship between the geometries of deep targets and near-surface horizons are dependent on the structural model, structural disconformities or changes in structural style. Therefore, a good understanding of the mechanical stratigraphy and its influence on structural geometry is critical in delineating poorly-imaged traps.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 9---------------