About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Predicting Structural
Trap
Geometries
in Overthrust Belts
Trap
Geometries
in Overthrust BeltsBy
ARCO Exploration and
Production Technology, Plano, TX
Trap
-forming
structures in
overthrust belts are
commonly characterized
by structural
complexity and poor
seismic data quality.
Therefore, seismic
data is usually insufficient
to constrain
the location and size
of potential structural traps. Geologic and
geophysical data, when combined with
structural modeling and balanced cross
section techniques can improve structural
interpretations and thereby reduce
trap
risk
for prospective structures.
Predictive models for interpreting structural styles must incorporate key geometric and kinematic characteristics observed in well-constrained surface and subsurface structures. Mechanical contrasts of key lithotectonic units play an important role in determining the type and geometry of fold-fault relationships, such as fault-bend, fault-propagation, and detachment folds. Lithotectonic packages with strong competency contrasts, such as thick carbonate units encased within thin shale units, result in fault-bend folds and duplexes. Examples of this structural style are found in the Sawtooth Range in Montana, the Canadian Foothills and the Southern Appalachians. Moderate to low competency contrasts, such as interlayered, thin-bedded sandstones characterized by high flexural slip efficiency, result in fault-propagation folds. Examples of these styles are found in the Polish and Romanian Carpathians. Overthrust belts characterized by relatively competent packages overlying weak shales or salt typically result in disharmonic, detachment folds with related accommodation faults. Examples of this style are found in the Dinaride, Zagros, and Jura fold belts.
Delineation of deep anticlinal traps typically involves the extrapolation of surface
and near-surface geometries to deeper
horizons.
Trap
risks are related to
changes
in the geometry, location, and size of structures
with depth. The relationship between
the geometries of deep targets and near-surface
horizons are dependent on the
structural model, structural disconformities
or
changes
in structural style. Therefore, a
good understanding of the mechanical
stratigraphy and its influence on structural
geometry is critical in delineating poorly-imaged
traps.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 9---------------