About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Burgos Basin Play
Analysis
Reveals Frio-Vicksburg Exploration Focus Areas
Analysis
Reveals Frio-Vicksburg Exploration Focus AreasBy
1 The Scotia Group, Houston, Texas
2 Pemex Exploration and Production, Reynosa, Mexico
3 Hamilton Geosciences, Austin, Texas
Recently, Scotia and Pemex completed a detailed
analysis
of
the Burgos basin's Frio-Vicksburg play to identify future
exploration focus areas. The Frio-Vicksburg play is one of five
Tertiary producing trends, which are, from the west to east,
Paleocene-Eocene, Wilcox-Queen City, Jackson-Yegua, Frio-
Vicksburg and Miocene. The Frio-Vicksburg
and Wilcox-Queen City
plays
together produce
97% of the gas in the Burgos basin. The
Frio-Vicksburg play alone has produced more
than 4.1 tef.
This study involved the regional mapping of
major structural elements, definition of the
Frio- Vicksburg stratigraphic framework,
mapping of
depositional
systems, reservoir
sands, well performance and show data, and
integration and comparison with the Frio-
Vicksburg in south Texas. Fifty-two subplays
were identified within 13 stratigraphic units
across the study area, which were recombined
into six
plays
to aid in comparison
with south Texas producing analogs.
Plays
were then ranked and stacked to identify
future focus areas.
Three structural provinces are recognized across the study area. In the northwestern part of the Burgos basin, Vicksburg expansion dominates the first province, whereas in the second province, east of the Frio Francisco-Cano fault system, an expanded Frio section dominates. The third province is distinguished by a northeast- to southwest-trending normal fault system that extends across the entire southern half of the study area.
The top of the Frio formation is relatively unstructured in the Burgos basin and displays a north-south structural grain and gentle east dip. Significantly more structural relief exists at the Lower Frio SB30 level, particularly east of the Francisco-Cano expansion fault. Sediments outcrop in the west and reach greater than 5,000 m in the east. Both the Frio and Vicksburg traps include high-side and low-side fault-dependent structures and combination structural-stratigraphic traps.
Depositional
systems mapping and play
analysis
Depositional
architecture mapping has identified
major
depositional
systems that include
- Bedload and coastal streamplain systems
- Fluvial and wave-reworked delta systems
- Strandplain and barrier lagoon systems
- Inter-deltaic embayments
- Shelf and slope systems.
The most dominant subplays include those in the barrier-lagoon and wave-reworked delta systems, which together make up 24 of the 52 subplays. These cover 34% of the total area, yet contribute 74% of the Frio-Vicksburg production. The next largest contributors are bedload-fluvial and fluvial-dominated deltas, which cover 19% of the total play area and have contributed 18% of the Frio- Vicksburg production. Both shelf and slope have been historically poor producers, while interdeltaic embayment subplays have no production to date.
Comparison with Texas analogs
South Texas is geologically and geographically contiguous with the Burgos basin and, because of its maturity of hydrocarbon exploration and development, offers a unique opportunity for
End_Page 33---------------
providing insight into the future potential of the Burgos
basin. In the simplest comparison, significantly more wells
have been drilled in Texas than in the Burgos basin, over
83,000 wells in Railroad District 4 (RRD4), some 28 times
more than the 2,900 wells drilled in the Burgos basin.
Similarly, there are currently 9,299 producing wells in RRD4,
compared with 800 in the Burgos basin. To facilitate comparison
between Texas and the Burgos basin, the Frio-Vicksburg
trend was divided into six play regions based on tectonic and
depositional
systems and hydrocarbon trapping styles. Four
of the Texas
plays
can be correlated with major producing
regions in the Burgos basin.
Conclusions
There is considerable exploration potential and reserves growth opportunities from field rehabilitation in Mexico's Burgos basin. The greatest potential in Vicksburg reservoirs is interpreted to exist in the deeper stratigraphic units where extending the structural mapping along trend from current production may define additional anticlinal closures. Shallower Vicksburg and Frio units also have potential in untested fault blocks. In the deep Frio unit, rollover anticlinal traps south of the Reynosa- McAllen fault zone and fault traps along other major growth faults are expected.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 35---------------