About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Houston Geological Society Bulletin

Abstract


Houston Geological Society Bulletin, Volume 45, No. 5, January 2003. Pages 33 and 35.

Abstract: Burgos Basin Play Analysis Reveals Frio-Vicksburg Exploration Focus Areas

By

Mark A. Cocker1, Lynne R. Goodoff1, J. Antonio Cuevas Leree2, Ricardo Martinez Sierra2, J. Javier Hernandez Mendoza2, and Douglas S. Hamilton3
1 The Scotia Group, Houston, Texas
2 Pemex Exploration and Production, Reynosa, Mexico
3 Hamilton Geosciences, Austin, Texas

Recently, Scotia and Pemex completed a detailed analysis of the Burgos basin's Frio-Vicksburg play to identify future exploration focus areas. The Frio-Vicksburg play is one of five Tertiary producing trends, which are, from the west to east, Paleocene-Eocene, Wilcox-Queen City, Jackson-Yegua, Frio- Vicksburg and Miocene. The Frio-Vicksburg and Wilcox-Queen City plays together produce 97% of the gas in the Burgos basin. The Frio-Vicksburg play alone has produced more than 4.1 tef.

This study involved the regional mapping of major structural elements, definition of the Frio- Vicksburg stratigraphic framework, mapping of depositional systems, reservoir sands, well performance and show data, and integration and comparison with the Frio- Vicksburg in south Texas. Fifty-two subplays were identified within 13 stratigraphic units across the study area, which were recombined into six plays to aid in comparison with south Texas producing analogs. Plays were then ranked and stacked to identify future focus areas.

Three structural provinces are recognized across the study area. In the northwestern part of the Burgos basin, Vicksburg expansion dominates the first province, whereas in the second province, east of the Frio Francisco-Cano fault system, an expanded Frio section dominates. The third province is distinguished by a northeast- to southwest-trending normal fault system that extends across the entire southern half of the study area.

The top of the Frio formation is relatively unstructured in the Burgos basin and displays a north-south structural grain and gentle east dip. Significantly more structural relief exists at the Lower Frio SB30 level, particularly east of the Francisco-Cano expansion fault. Sediments outcrop in the west and reach greater than 5,000 m in the east. Both the Frio and Vicksburg traps include high-side and low-side fault-dependent structures and combination structural-stratigraphic traps.

Depositional systems mapping and play analysis

Depositional architecture mapping has identified major depositional systems that include

  • Bedload and coastal streamplain systems
  • Fluvial and Previous HitwaveNext Hit-reworked delta systems
  • Strandplain and barrier lagoon systems
  • Inter-deltaic embayments
  • Shelf and slope systems.

The most dominant subplays include those in the barrier-lagoon and Previous HitwaveNext Hit-reworked delta systems, which together make up 24 of the 52 subplays. These cover 34% of the total area, yet contribute 74% of the Frio-Vicksburg production. The next largest contributors are bedload-fluvial and fluvial-dominated deltas, which cover 19% of the total play area and have contributed 18% of the Frio- Vicksburg production. Both shelf and slope have been historically poor producers, while interdeltaic embayment subplays have no production to date.

Comparison with Texas analogs

South Texas is geologically and geographically contiguous with the Burgos basin and, because of its maturity of hydrocarbon exploration and development, offers a unique opportunity for

End_Page 33---------------

providing insight into the future Previous HitpotentialNext Hit of the Burgos basin. In the simplest comparison, significantly more wells have been drilled in Texas than in the Burgos basin, over 83,000 wells in Railroad District 4 (RRD4), some 28 times more than the 2,900 wells drilled in the Burgos basin. Similarly, there are currently 9,299 producing wells in RRD4, compared with 800 in the Burgos basin. To facilitate comparison between Texas and the Burgos basin, the Frio-Vicksburg trend was divided into six play regions based on tectonic and depositional systems and hydrocarbon trapping styles. Four of the Texas plays can be correlated with major producing regions in the Burgos basin.

Conclusions

There is considerable exploration Previous HitpotentialNext Hit and reserves growth opportunities from field rehabilitation in Mexico's Burgos basin. The greatest Previous HitpotentialNext Hit in Vicksburg reservoirs is interpreted to exist in the deeper stratigraphic units where extending the structural mapping along trend from current production may define additional anticlinal closures. Shallower Vicksburg and Frio units also have Previous HitpotentialTop in untested fault blocks. In the deep Frio unit, rollover anticlinal traps south of the Reynosa- McAllen fault zone and fault traps along other major growth faults are expected.

End_of_Record - Last_Page 35---------------

 

Copyright © 2005 by Houston Geological Society. All rights reserved.