About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Burgos
Basin
Play
Analysis Reveals Frio-Vicksburg Exploration Focus Areas
Basin
Play
Analysis Reveals Frio-Vicksburg Exploration Focus AreasBy
1 The Scotia Group, Houston, Texas
2 Pemex Exploration and Production, Reynosa, Mexico
3 Hamilton Geosciences, Austin, Texas
Recently, Scotia and Pemex completed a detailed analysis of
the Burgos
basin's
Frio-Vicksburg
play
to identify future
exploration focus areas. The Frio-Vicksburg
play
is one of five
Tertiary producing trends, which are, from the west to east,
Paleocene-Eocene, Wilcox-Queen City, Jackson-Yegua, Frio-
Vicksburg and Miocene. The Frio-Vicksburg
and Wilcox-Queen City plays together produce
97% of the gas in the Burgos
basin
. The
Frio-Vicksburg
play
alone has produced more
than 4.1 tef.
This study involved the regional mapping of major structural elements, definition of the Frio- Vicksburg stratigraphic framework, mapping of depositional systems, reservoir sands, well performance and show data, and integration and comparison with the Frio- Vicksburg in south Texas. Fifty-two subplays were identified within 13 stratigraphic units across the study area, which were recombined into six plays to aid in comparison with south Texas producing analogs. Plays were then ranked and stacked to identify future focus areas.
Three structural provinces are recognized across the study area.
In the northwestern part of the Burgos
basin
, Vicksburg expansion
dominates the first
province
, whereas in the second
province
, east of the Frio Francisco-Cano fault
system
,
an expanded Frio section dominates. The third
province
is
distinguished by a northeast- to southwest-trending normal
fault
system
that extends across the entire southern half of
the study area.
The top of the Frio formation is relatively unstructured in the
Burgos
basin
and displays a north-south structural grain and
gentle east dip. Significantly more structural relief exists at the
Lower Frio SB30 level, particularly east of the Francisco-Cano
expansion fault. Sediments outcrop in the west and reach
greater than 5,000 m in the east. Both the Frio and Vicksburg
traps include high-side and low-side fault-dependent
structures and combination
structural-stratigraphic traps.
Depositional systems mapping and
play
analysis
Depositional architecture mapping has identified major depositional systems that include
- Bedload and coastal streamplain systems
- Fluvial and wave-reworked delta systems
- Strandplain and barrier lagoon systems
- Inter-deltaic embayments
- Shelf and slope systems.
The most dominant subplays include those in
the barrier-lagoon and wave-reworked delta
systems, which together make up 24 of the 52
subplays. These cover 34% of the total area, yet
contribute 74% of the Frio-Vicksburg production.
The next largest contributors are
bedload-fluvial and fluvial-dominated deltas, which cover 19%
of the total
play
area and have contributed 18% of the Frio-
Vicksburg production. Both shelf and slope have been
historically poor producers, while interdeltaic embayment subplays
have no production to date.
Comparison with Texas analogs
South Texas is geologically and geographically contiguous with
the Burgos
basin
and, because of its maturity of hydrocarbon
exploration and development, offers a unique opportunity for
End_Page 33---------------
providing insight into the future potential of the Burgos
basin
. In the simplest comparison, significantly more wells
have been drilled in Texas than in the Burgos
basin
, over
83,000 wells in Railroad District 4 (RRD4), some 28 times
more than the 2,900 wells drilled in the Burgos
basin
.
Similarly, there are currently 9,299 producing wells in RRD4,
compared with 800 in the Burgos
basin
. To facilitate comparison
between Texas and the Burgos
basin
, the Frio-Vicksburg
trend was divided into six
play
regions based on tectonic and
depositional systems and hydrocarbon trapping styles. Four
of the Texas plays can be correlated with major producing
regions in the Burgos
basin
.
Conclusions
There is considerable exploration potential and reserves growth
opportunities from field rehabilitation in Mexico's Burgos
basin
. The greatest potential in Vicksburg reservoirs is interpreted
to exist in the deeper stratigraphic units where extending the
structural mapping along trend from current production may
define additional anticlinal closures. Shallower Vicksburg and
Frio units also have potential in untested fault blocks. In the
deep Frio unit, rollover anticlinal traps south of the Reynosa-
McAllen fault zone and fault traps along other major growth
faults are expected.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 35---------------