About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Jonah Field Area:
Seismic
Coherency
Cube
Technology Used to Define
Trap Boundaries and Stratigraphic Features
Seismic
Coherency
Cube
Technology Used to Define
Trap Boundaries and Stratigraphic FeaturesBy
1 BP, Houston, TX
2 Consultant, North Plains, OR
Jonah Field, Sublette County, Wyoming, is expected to produce at least 1.5TCF of natural gas from lenticular, over-pressured, tight formation gas fluvial sandstones of the Cretaceous-age Lance Formation. Depth of production is 7,500 to 12,400 feet and the gross producing interval is 1500 to 3200 feet. Jonah was indicated to be a significant field in early 1993 (Robinson, 2000) and now produces more than 400 MMCFD from more than 200 wells (Fig. 1). In-fill drilling on 40-acre spacing has been underway since mid-2000. Entrapment may result from a combination of dip reversal and fault zone deformation associated with faults that intersect up dip to form a wedge-shaped compartment. Apparent throw on the bounding faults is variable, but commonly is less than 200 feet.
Seismic
imaging of the Jonah Field is
challenging because of complex fault
throws and generally dim and discontinuous
reflections within the producing
interval. Reservoir heterogeneity is the
result of both depositional and tectonic
processes. First-order and second-order
heterogeneities were created by a direct
interplay of tectonics and deposition.
Third-order and forth-order heterogeneities
reflect depositional details
within channel-fill and channel-belt
facies.
Tectonics, including regional asymmetric subsidence in front of
the Wind River allochthon and local syndepositional movements,
are associated with three important unconformities at
Jonah Field. These unconformities range in age from Late
Cretaceous (Campanian) to Middle? Paleocene. From oldest to
youngest the unconformities are base of Ericson Formation,
base of Lance Formation, and base of the Fort Union
Formation. The Lance Formation thickens northeastward across
Jonah Field from 2500 to 4000 feet as a result of changing
accommodation space induced by flexural loading of the crust
during emplacement of the Wind River Uplift (Fig. 2).
Conversely, the updip thinning is accomplished by basal onlap,
intraformational truncation, and gradual convergence of strata.
In the eastern part of the field, down dip from section 27, we
interpret local southwestward onlap of the basal Lance
Formation onto the eroded top of the Mesaverde Group.
Separately, a thick interval of younger lower Lance Formation
strata is beveled southwestward towards the apex of the field in
the area updip from section 27. Erosion of the Lance Formation
at the base of the Fort Union Formation becomes important
west of Jonah Field. Figure 3 is an arbitrary
seismic
line traversing
Jonah Field in the direction of regional dip.
Figure 1. Jonah Gas Field Index Map.
End_Page 21---------------
Depositional processes are believed to be the most important contributors
to third and fourth order reservoir heterogeneities in
Jonah Field. Integrated well log, core,
seismic
, and regional geologic
data
support the interpretation that Jonah reservoirs are primarily
lenticular channel fill and channel belt sandstones deposited by
low-sinuosity fluvial systems that flowed southeastward along the
rapidly subsiding basin axis toward the Interior Cretaceous seaway.
Within the Lance Formation the more continuous reflections are
usually associated with flood basin
mudstone bodies. Questions of
well spacing and well density are
probably most dependent upon
the depositional fabric of fluvial
facies in addition to the degree of
compaction and diagenetic occlusion
of the intergranular pores.
Advanced
seismic
techniques have
been applied to a proprietary
3-D
seismic
survey to define the trap
boundaries and to optimally locate
development wells at Jonah Field.
One of the main tools used for our
interpretation has been a
3-D
broad-band amplitude-based
coherency algorithm (Marfurt and
Kirlin,2000) that has edge detection
capabilities. This algorithm looks at
the reflector amplitude gradient
and captures the lateral change in
amplitude with azimuthal angle.
This allows the interpreter to "illuminate"
a particular feature from
the optimal angle to see the maximum
detail within the
data
. On the
southern part of the Pinedale
Anticline east of Jonah Field, this
technology allows us to visualize
large Fort Union Formation sandstone
bodies comprised of
coalesced fluvial (meander belt)
channel fill. These sandstone bodies
abruptly terminate along the west
flank of the anticline suggesting a
mid-Paleocene phase of structural
development although most of the
folding of the southern part of the
Pinedale Anticline clearly affects the
Early Eocene Wasatch Formation.
Figure 2. Type logs for west and east parts of the Jonah Field. See Figure 1 for location of these wells.
End_Page 21---------------
Figure 3. Arbitrary
3-D
seismic
line displaying five key well logs including Wells 1 and 4 shown on Figure 2. This
seismic
line is oriented generally
northeasterly in a dip direction extending from a point 1.7 miles west of Jonah Field to the syncline near the eastern down dip extent of Jonah Field.
Total length is approximately 12.1 miles (64,000 feet). Well 1 is directionally drilled along the western boundary fault of the field. The fault is
obscured by the well log overlay. Well 3 is located near the center of the field and penetrates the Ericson Formation. Well 4 is located on the up-thrown
side of an important fault and the well log overlay obscures much of the fault. Well 5 defines the down dip limit of production as presently known in
this area. Elevations are shown along the side of the
seismic
line at intervals of 1000 feet.
Stratigraphic horizons areas follows:
FTUN Fort Union Formation top
TUN Unnamed Tertiary Unit top
LNCE Lance Formation top
MVRD Mesaverde Group top
ERCS Ericson Formation top
The following stratigraphic units are approximately located:
RKSP Rock Springs Formation
HLRD Hilliard Formation, base lies below bottom
seismic
data
.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 23---------------