About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract:
Subsalt
Type Archetype Classification: A Diagnostic Tool for
Predicting and Prioritizing
Gulf
of
Mexico
Subsalt
Traps
Subsalt
Type Archetype Classification: A Diagnostic Tool for
Predicting and Prioritizing
Gulf
of
Mexico
Subsalt
TrapsBy
BP, Houston, Texas
Many
Gulf
of
Mexico
subsalt
traps remain poorly imaged on
even the best depth-migrated seismic datasets, necessitating
the use of geologic models to help guide prospect evaluations.
We introduce a
subsalt
trap classification scheme to address a
long-standing industry need for a
comprehensive and practical
method of characterizing
subsalt
traps according to their structural
merits. Designed for exploration
applications, the classification helps
interpreters recognize and, in the
case of ambiguous seismic data, infer
the presence of key trap attributes
that improve or diminish
subsalt
prospectivity. This trap assessment
tool is based on the following tenets:
- The full spectrum of
Gulf
of
Mexico
subsalt
structural styles
can be effectively described by a finite number of trap archetypes,
each connoting a particular set of trap risk factors. - Ribbon truncation closures and upwardly flexed
subsalt
stratal
crests increase trap risk, whereas downwardly flexed and inverted
stratal crests generally improve trap viability. - Within
Gulf
of
Mexico
multi-tiered salt systems,
subsalt
trap
geometries manifest the kinematic linkage (or lack of linkage)
between targeted strata and underlying autochthonous and
allochthonous salt bodies. - Although deep salt tectonic sequences can be complex and varied,
their net effect on
subsalt
stratal geometry can be described
by four constituent deformation modes: rotation, counter-rotation,
upward flexures, and downward flexures.
Subsalt
stratal deformation modes are, in turn, impacted by the
underlying salt root type; autochthonous roots, fore-ramping
allochthonous roots, and back-ramping allochthonous roots
each impose a distinctive suite of stratal motions and flexural
styles on overlying
subsalt
strata.
These three root types define genetic
subsalt
trap families that exhibit
characteristic ranges in geometry
and prospectivity.- Traps formed against sutured salt base highs are a fourth trap family, often remaining kinematically unlinked to deep salt roots and thus preserving their pre-suture stratal truncation patterns.
The four trap families are qualitatively ranked for overall trap
risk and play value, a ranking that is affirmed by
Gulf
of
Mexico
subsalt
drilling results. Contractional, extensional, and passive
subsalt
anticlines occur almost exclusively above deep
autochthonous salt, and traps of the top-ranked autochthon
rooted play family have yielded the largest
subsalt
discoveries to
date. Although
subsalt
traps underlain by back-ramping
allochthonous salt roots lack anticlinal closures, they often
exhibit inverted, flat-crested sigmoid folds and may present the
best play opportunities updip of the autochthon rooted
subsalt
trends. The family of
subsalt
traps underlain by fore-ramping
allochthonous roots is relegated to a third-place ranking because
of the generic risk of upwardly flexed trap crests, although
specific variations (e.g., piggyback sills with
subsalt
inversions)
may remain highly prospective. Lastly, sub-suture traps often
retain their pre-suture stratal synclines, forming bi-lateral ribbon
truncation closures. These high-risk traps remain problematic
for the industry.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 23---------------