About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Basin-Center Gas or Subtle
Conventional
Traps?
Conventional
Traps?By
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation,
The Woodlands, TX
Tight gas plays are an important gas resource in many Rocky
Mountain basins and basin-center gas (BCG) models have
been proposed to characterize much of this resource. Recent
drilling and 3D seismic results require modifications of the currently
accepted BCG models that were first introduced over 25
years ago. Several tight gas plays in the Greater Green River Basin in
southern Wyoming are reviewed to illustrate inconsistencies with
the prevalent BCG models. The key to future exploration success in
the Rocky Mountain region is recognizing the subtle
conventional
stratigraphic and structural controls of these tight gas plays.
Current BCG models depict a relatively uniform pressure seal
separating
conventional
traps with associated down-dip water
from “unconventional” traps characterized by anomalous reservoir
pressure and lack of associated water. These models have led to
the misconception of predicting commercial basin-wide gas
deposits below a given structural elevation or thermal maturation
depth that can lead to predicting overstated reserves and overly
optimistic drilling success rates.
New subsurface data have revealed inconsistencies with the
established BCG models (presence of down-dip water, subtle
fault traps, fracture and stratigraphic controls, etc.). More contemporary
BCG models invoke a “sweet spot” concept to
highlight the need to identify areas of improved reservoir quality
to increase the probability of economically successful results.
More recent studies of BCG plays reveal that the primary trap
controls are better described as
conventional
, although subtle,
stratigraphic and structural traps.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 33---------------