About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: The Selection of an Environmental Laboratory: What to Do and What Not to Do
By
W. S. Hitchcock, Inc.
Successful laboratory programs depend heavily on the shared understanding of the end data user’s needs. The person responsible for selecting the laboratory must understand the data user’s needs and communicate those needs to the laboratory. Laboratory selection cannot be made until the data quality objectives have been established.
The end data user’s needs determine the data quality objectives (DQOs). The DQOs are used to select the level of required performance (LORPs). The LORPs include methods, detection limits, and quality control limits. Not all laboratories can meet the levels that you may require, or even perform the analytical methods you may require.
Determination
of the qualifications of a laboratory is obtained
through a recent audit performed by a qualified chemist who has
a clear understanding of your DQOs. The audit(s) should be
augmented with performance evaluation samples, which are
samples of known concentration that are sent to the laboratory
for analysis and reporting. Their analysis provides a check of
both the laboratory’s equipment capabilities and its quality control
program. The reporting process is also reviewed during this
test to see if the laboratory does indeed deliver all the required
data in a usable format, and in a timely manner.
The two most common causes for failure of an analytical program
are failure to clearly define DQOs and failure to clearly
communicate them to the laboratory. Expectations, such as
LORPs deliverables, schedules, and special quality control needs
,must be clearly communicated with the laboratory. Using a data
form that can serve as a checklist is highly recommended. Once
you have identified two or three labs that can and will do what
you need, then price can be considered. The saying “You get what
you
pay
for” generally applies at this point in an evaluation. If a
laboratory has substantially lower rates, the auditing chemist
might discover that is due to a cost-cutting practice that would
render the data results unsuitable for your use. However, under
some circumstances it is possible to lower prices by leveraging
other projects.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 11---------------