About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Houston Geological Society Bulletin


Houston Geological Society Bulletin, Volume 47, No. 2, October 2004. Pages 32-32.

Abstract: The Winds of Change: Anisotropic Rocks— Their Preferred Direction of Fluid Flow and Their Associated Previous HitSeismicNext Hit Signatures


Heloise Lynn

Although 20 years ago it was politically incorrect to admit that horizontal permeability Previous HitanisotropyNext Hit resulting from aligned connected porosity was linked with Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitanisotropyNext Hit (azimuthal Previous HitanisotropyNext Hit), the winds have changed.

Our industry now has a respectable worldwide effort in research, acquisition, processing, interpretation and modeling that pursues precisely that linkage. The current thought process is that unequal horizontal stresses and/or vertical aligned fractures can provide the aligned, connected porosity that may result in horizontal permeability Previous HitanisotropyNext Hit. The presence of vertical aligned fractures and/or unequal horizontal stresses typically causes azimuthal Previous HitanisotropyNext Hit.

The earliest efforts pursued the azimuthal variation of PP and SS traveltimes and amplitudes, because these pure-mode Previous HitseismicNext Hit waves measurements are the “easiest” measurements our industry can process and interpret, and we believe we understand traveltimes and amplitudes. Thus our documentation of the relationship of azimuthal PP and split shear-wave measurements was founded.

As time went on, the PS modes (P-S1 and P-S2) or the split C-wave (converted wave—P down and S up) were used to document the shear-wave Previous HitanisotropyNext Hit arising from unequal horizontal stress and/or vertical aligned fractures. Now, however, our industry is grappling with what researchers point out as the “biggest” anomaly that links horizontal permeability Previous HitanisotropyNext Hit to Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitanisotropyNext Hit—azimuthal variation in attenuation. However, attenuation has usually received cursory dismissal.We don’t like “dim zones” being “pay” because (1) they are “too hard” to map, (2) there are too many other reasons for dim zones rather than azimuthal attenuation and (3) attenuation is too hard to quantify and attribute to any one cause per se. In the past, we have often used trace equalization, AGC, spectral whitening and other very powerful processing techniques to remove dim zones. Processors worth their salt made those pesky dim zones look nice and bright and sharp!

In the past, attenuation has been a classic problem and not a “solution” to anything. Now, however, we can glide forward on the next wave of multi-component, multi-mode, multi-azimuth 3D and 4D Previous HitseismicTop powered by the winds of change.

End_of_Record - Last_Page 32---------------

Copyright © 2007 by Houston Geological Society. All rights reserved.