About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Understanding Myths and Realities of
Basin
-
Centered
Resources
Basin
-
Centered
ResourcesBy
The Discovery Group
Denver, Colorado
With demand for efficient, environmentally clean sources of
energy increasing, attention is sharply focused on natural
gas
resources. Within North America, much of this attention is
directed at unconventional resources, particularly those commonly
referred to as
basin
-
centered
or
continuous-type
gas
accumulations.
We have re-examined the controls on
gas
production from very low-permeability
reservoirs. Our work in the Green River
Basin of southwest Wyoming clearly indicates
that low-permeability reservoirs in
this basin are not part of a continuous type
gas
accumulation or
a basin-center
gas
system in which
productivity is dependent on the
development
of enigmatic “sweet-spots.” Rather,
gas
fields in this basin occur in low-permeability,
poor-quality reservoir rocks within conventional traps.
Examination of fields with greater than 50 BCFE expected ultimate
recovery indicates that 38% of the
gas
fields involve structural traps
accounting for 50% of the
gas
production, 41% of the
gas
fields
involve stratigraphic traps accounting for 30% of the
gas
production,
and 21% of the fields occur in combination traps contributing
20% of the
gas
production. In no case was a significant
gas
field
found to occur as a sweet spot within a background matrix of poor
rock. Nor was there a significant
gas
field that could be explained as
simply the preferred occurrence of natural fractures.
We present evidence that the basin is neither regionally
gas
-saturated,
nor is it at or near irreducible water saturation. Water
production is both common and widespread. Our work shows
that while overall water volumes are indeed low, water-
gas
ratios
are much higher than can be explained as water of condensation.
In the greater Green River Basin (GGRB), water of condensation
should be less than approximately 1.0 bbl water/MMscf
gas
. Of
more than 7500 producing
gas
wells in the GGRB, 70% of the
wells have water-
gas
ratios in excess of 1.0 bbl wtr/MMscf
gas
.
These wells account for almost 50% of the basin’s
gas
production.
In many fields, water-
gas
ratio data show a clear increase in water-
gas
ratios toward the down-dip margins of
gas
accumulations,
something that is commonly observed in conventional petroleum
provinces.
We have also re-examined key petrophysical
relationships in low-permeability
reservoirs through the collection of a
large data-set of effective permeability
measurements at varying water saturations
and at overburden stress. These
data show that unlike more traditional
reservoirs, low-permeability reservoirs
are characterized by having critical water
saturations that are substantially less than
irreducible water saturations and critical
gas
saturations in the vicinity of 50%
water saturation. These observations have been captured in a
model now known as “permeability jail” emphasizing the fact that
there exists a relatively broad range of water saturations across
which neither water nor
gas
can be effectively produced, despite
the fact that both phases are present in the reservoir. The lack of
water production does not relate to irreducible water saturation as
had been previously suggested, rather it simply suggests that water
saturation is less than critical water saturation.
We conclude that low-permeability
gas
systems similar to those
found in the greater Green River Basin do not require a paradigm
shift in terms of hydrocarbon systems as some have suggested.
Rather, these
gas
systems are conventional in nature.
Gas
accumulations
are not continuously distributed but rather are distributed
in discrete accumulations whose boundaries are well explained.
As a result, resource assessments have very likely greatly overstated
the potential resource and at the same time have under-estimated
the risks associated with exploration and
development
investment
decisions in these low-permeability systems.
End_Page 21---------------
For enterprises engaged in exploration and production in these
settings, attention must be paid to the conventional elements of
risk within the petroleum systems, namely, reservoir, trap, seal,
source, migration and charge. Substantial opportunity remains
in many of these basins. For enterprises engaged in
gas
-supply
issues, it must be realized that there is greater risk associated with
exploration and the identification of new sources of
gas
than is
generally appreciated. Finally, for those groups engaged in public
policy, land-use planning, etc., the increased uncertainty in
supply should encourage the creation of alternate energy options
as opposed to reliance on a limited suite of resources whose risks
are greater than advertised.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 23---------------