About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Houston Geological Society Bulletin

Abstract


Houston Geological Society Bulletin, Volume 47, No. 6, February 2005. Pages 21 and 23.

Abstract: Understanding Myths and Realities of Previous HitBasinNext Hit-Previous HitCenteredNext Hit Resources

By

Keith Shanley and Robert M. Cluff
The Discovery Group
Denver, Colorado

With demand for efficient, environmentally clean sources of energy increasing, attention is sharply focused on natural Previous HitgasNext Hit resources. Within North America, much of this attention is directed at unconventional resources, particularly those commonly referred to as Previous HitbasinNext Hit-Previous HitcenteredNext Hit or continuous-type Previous HitgasNext Hit accumulations.

We have re-examined the controls on Previous HitgasNext Hit production from very low-permeability reservoirs. Our work in the Green River Basin of southwest Wyoming clearly indicates that low-permeability reservoirs in this basin are not part of a continuous type Previous HitgasNext Hit accumulation or a basin-center Previous HitgasNext Hit system in which productivity is dependent on the Previous HitdevelopmentNext Hit of enigmatic “sweet-spots.” Rather, Previous HitgasNext Hit fields in this basin occur in low-permeability, poor-quality reservoir rocks within conventional traps. Examination of fields with greater than 50 BCFE expected ultimate recovery indicates that 38% of the Previous HitgasNext Hit fields involve structural traps accounting for 50% of the Previous HitgasNext Hit production, 41% of the Previous HitgasNext Hit fields involve stratigraphic traps accounting for 30% of the Previous HitgasNext Hit production, and 21% of the fields occur in combination traps contributing 20% of the Previous HitgasNext Hit production. In no case was a significant Previous HitgasNext Hit field found to occur as a sweet spot within a background matrix of poor rock. Nor was there a significant Previous HitgasNext Hit field that could be explained as simply the preferred occurrence of natural fractures.

We present evidence that the basin is neither regionally Previous HitgasNext Hit-saturated, nor is it at or near irreducible water saturation. Water production is both common and widespread. Our work shows that while overall water volumes are indeed low, water-Previous HitgasNext Hit ratios are much higher than can be explained as water of condensation. In the greater Green River Basin (GGRB), water of condensation should be less than approximately 1.0 bbl water/MMscf Previous HitgasNext Hit. Of more than 7500 producing Previous HitgasNext Hit wells in the GGRB, 70% of the wells have water-Previous HitgasNext Hit ratios in excess of 1.0 bbl wtr/MMscf Previous HitgasNext Hit. These wells account for almost 50% of the basin’s Previous HitgasNext Hit production. In many fields, water-Previous HitgasNext Hit ratio data show a clear increase in water-Previous HitgasNext Hit ratios toward the down-dip margins of Previous HitgasNext Hit accumulations, something that is commonly observed in conventional petroleum provinces.

We have also re-examined key petrophysical relationships in low-permeability reservoirs through the collection of a large data-set of effective permeability measurements at varying water saturations and at overburden stress. These data show that unlike more traditional reservoirs, low-permeability reservoirs are characterized by having critical water saturations that are substantially less than irreducible water saturations and critical Previous HitgasNext Hit saturations in the vicinity of 50% water saturation. These observations have been captured in a model now known as “permeability jail” emphasizing the fact that there exists a relatively broad range of water saturations across which neither water nor Previous HitgasNext Hit can be effectively produced, despite the fact that both phases are present in the reservoir. The lack of water production does not relate to irreducible water saturation as had been previously suggested, rather it simply suggests that water saturation is less than critical water saturation.

We conclude that low-permeability Previous HitgasNext Hit systems similar to those found in the greater Green River Basin do not require a paradigm shift in terms of hydrocarbon systems as some have suggested. Rather, these Previous HitgasNext Hit systems are conventional in nature. Previous HitGasNext Hit accumulations are not continuously distributed but rather are distributed in discrete accumulations whose boundaries are well explained. As a result, resource assessments have very likely greatly overstated the potential resource and at the same time have under-estimated the risks associated with exploration and Previous HitdevelopmentNext Hit investment decisions in these low-permeability systems.

End_Page 21---------------

For enterprises engaged in exploration and production in these settings, attention must be paid to the conventional elements of risk within the petroleum systems, namely, reservoir, trap, seal, source, migration and charge. Substantial opportunity remains in many of these basins. For enterprises engaged in Previous HitgasNext Hit-supply issues, it must be realized that there is greater risk associated with exploration and the identification of new sources of Previous HitgasTop than is generally appreciated. Finally, for those groups engaged in public policy, land-use planning, etc., the increased uncertainty in supply should encourage the creation of alternate energy options as opposed to reliance on a limited suite of resources whose risks are greater than advertised.

End_of_Record - Last_Page 23---------------

Copyright © 2007 by Houston Geological Society. All rights reserved.