About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Understanding Myths and Realities of
Basin-Centered Resources
By
The Discovery Group
Denver, Colorado
With demand for efficient, environmentally clean sources of energy increasing, attention is sharply focused on natural gas resources. Within North America, much of this attention is directed at unconventional resources, particularly those commonly referred to as basin-centered or continuous-type gas accumulations.
We have re-examined the controls on gas production from very low-permeability reservoirs. Our work in the Green River Basin of southwest Wyoming clearly indicates that low-permeability reservoirs in this basin are not part of a continuous type gas accumulation or a basin-center gas system in which productivity is dependent on the development of enigmatic “sweet-spots.” Rather, gas fields in this basin occur in low-permeability, poor-quality reservoir rocks within conventional traps. Examination of fields with greater than 50 BCFE expected ultimate recovery indicates that 38% of the gas fields involve structural traps accounting for 50% of the gas production, 41% of the gas fields involve stratigraphic traps accounting for 30% of the gas production, and 21% of the fields occur in combination traps contributing 20% of the gas production. In no case was a significant gas field found to occur as a sweet spot within a background matrix of poor rock. Nor was there a significant gas field that could be explained as simply the preferred occurrence of natural fractures.
We present evidence that the basin is neither regionally gas-saturated, nor is it at or near irreducible water saturation. Water production is both common and widespread. Our work shows that while overall water volumes are indeed low, water-gas ratios are much higher than can be explained as water of condensation. In the greater Green River Basin (GGRB), water of condensation should be less than approximately 1.0 bbl water/MMscf gas. Of more than 7500 producing gas wells in the GGRB, 70% of the wells have water-gas ratios in excess of 1.0 bbl wtr/MMscf gas. These wells account for almost 50% of the basin’s gas production. In many fields, water-gas ratio data show a clear increase in water-gas ratios toward the down-dip margins of gas accumulations, something that is commonly observed in conventional petroleum provinces.
We have also re-examined key petrophysical
relationships in low-permeability
reservoirs through the collection of a
large data-set of effective permeability
measurements at varying water saturations
and at overburden stress. These
data show that unlike more traditional
reservoirs, low-permeability reservoirs
are characterized by having
critical
water
saturations that are substantially less than
irreducible water saturations and
critical
gas saturations in the vicinity of 50%
water saturation. These observations have been captured in a
model now known as “permeability jail” emphasizing the fact that
there exists a relatively broad range of water saturations across
which neither water nor gas can be effectively produced, despite
the fact that both phases are present in the reservoir. The lack of
water production does not relate to irreducible water saturation as
had been previously suggested, rather it simply suggests that water
saturation is less than
critical
water saturation.
We conclude that low-permeability gas systems similar to those
found in the greater Green River Basin do not require a paradigm
shift in terms of
hydrocarbon
systems as some have suggested.
Rather, these gas systems are conventional in nature. Gas accumulations
are not continuously distributed but rather are distributed
in discrete accumulations whose boundaries are well explained.
As a result, resource assessments have very likely greatly overstated
the potential resource and at the same time have under-estimated
the risks associated with exploration and development investment
decisions in these low-permeability systems.
End_Page 21---------------
For enterprises engaged in exploration and production in these
settings, attention must be paid to the conventional
elements
of
risk within the petroleum systems, namely, reservoir, trap, seal,
source, migration and charge. Substantial opportunity remains
in many of these basins. For enterprises engaged in gas-supply
issues, it must be realized that there is greater risk associated with
exploration and the identification of new sources of gas than is
generally appreciated. Finally, for those groups engaged in public
policy, land-use planning, etc., the increased uncertainty in
supply should encourage the creation of alternate energy options
as opposed to reliance on a limited suite of resources whose risks
are greater than advertised.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 23---------------