About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Understanding Myths and Realities of
Basin-Centered Resources
By
The Discovery Group
Denver, Colorado
With demand for efficient, environmentally clean sources of energy increasing, attention is sharply focused on natural gas resources. Within North America, much of this attention is directed at unconventional resources, particularly those commonly referred to as basin-centered or continuous-type gas accumulations.
We have re-examined the controls on gas production from very low-permeability reservoirs. Our work in the Green River Basin of southwest Wyoming clearly indicates that low-permeability reservoirs in this basin are not part of a continuous type gas accumulation or a basin-center gas system in which productivity is dependent on the development of enigmatic “sweet-spots.” Rather, gas fields in this basin occur in low-permeability, poor-quality reservoir rocks within conventional traps. Examination of fields with greater than 50 BCFE expected ultimate recovery indicates that 38% of the gas fields involve structural traps accounting for 50% of the gas production, 41% of the gas fields involve stratigraphic traps accounting for 30% of the gas production, and 21% of the fields occur in combination traps contributing 20% of the gas production. In no case was a significant gas field found to occur as a sweet spot within a background matrix of poor rock. Nor was there a significant gas field that could be explained as simply the preferred occurrence of natural fractures.
We present evidence that the basin is neither regionally gas-saturated,
nor is it at or near irreducible
water
saturation.
Water
production is both common and widespread. Our work shows
that while overall
water
volumes are indeed low,
water
-gas ratios
are much higher than can be explained as
water
of condensation.
In the greater Green River Basin (GGRB),
water
of condensation
should be less than approximately 1.0 bbl
water
/MMscf gas. Of
more than 7500 producing gas wells in the GGRB, 70% of the
wells have
water
-gas ratios in excess of 1.0 bbl wtr/MMscf gas.
These wells account for almost 50% of the basin’s gas production.
In many fields,
water
-gas ratio data show a clear increase in
water
-gas
ratios toward the down-dip margins of gas accumulations,
something that is commonly observed in conventional petroleum
provinces.
We have also re-examined key petrophysical
relationships in low-permeability
reservoirs through the collection of a
large data-set of effective permeability
measurements at varying
water
saturations
and at overburden stress. These
data show that unlike more traditional
reservoirs, low-permeability reservoirs
are characterized by having critical
water
saturations that are substantially less than
irreducible
water
saturations and critical
gas saturations in the vicinity of 50%
water
saturation. These observations have been captured in a
model now known as “permeability jail” emphasizing the fact that
there exists a relatively broad range of
water
saturations across
which neither
water
nor gas can be effectively produced, despite
the fact that both phases are present in the reservoir. The lack of
water
production does not relate to irreducible
water
saturation as
had been previously suggested, rather it simply suggests that
water
saturation is less than critical
water
saturation.
We conclude that low-permeability gas systems similar to those found in the greater Green River Basin do not require a paradigm shift in terms of hydrocarbon systems as some have suggested. Rather, these gas systems are conventional in nature. Gas accumulations are not continuously distributed but rather are distributed in discrete accumulations whose boundaries are well explained. As a result, resource assessments have very likely greatly overstated the potential resource and at the same time have under-estimated the risks associated with exploration and development investment decisions in these low-permeability systems.
End_Page 21---------------
For enterprises engaged in exploration and production in these settings, attention must be paid to the conventional elements of risk within the petroleum systems, namely, reservoir, trap, seal, source, migration and charge. Substantial opportunity remains in many of these basins. For enterprises engaged in gas-supply issues, it must be realized that there is greater risk associated with exploration and the identification of new sources of gas than is generally appreciated. Finally, for those groups engaged in public policy, land-use planning, etc., the increased uncertainty in supply should encourage the creation of alternate energy options as opposed to reliance on a limited suite of resources whose risks are greater than advertised.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 23---------------