About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Uses, Abuses and Examples of Seismic-Derived
Acoustic Impedance Data:
What Does the Interpreter Need to Know?
By
Chevron Energy Technology Company
Houston
Throughout the years there has been a concerted effort to
integrate the geoscience disciplines to become more adept at
understanding the petroleum potential of an area. In the 1980s,
geophysicists interpreted 2D seismic data by overlaying log data
on paper seismic sections and using generalized depth-to-time
curves to determine which events represented
markers on the logs. Geologists interpreted
cross-sections by drawing straight lines
between wells to represent their correlations.
Because technology advances have changed the
process, many people today have become “interpreters”
of 2D or 3D data on workstations where
the log data, seismic data and many derivations
of the seismic data (
attributes
, coherence, P
impedance, inversions, elastic impedance, lambda rho, etc.) are
available to fine-tune the analysis process. The question, however,
still remains: Are we integrating the data yet?
Inversion of seismic data into acoustic impedance provides a
natural tie to the log impedance data and forces the geoscientist,
in analyzing seismic data, to extract appropriate wavelets,
determine the phase and amplitude of the data, determine
whether or not the phase is stable throughout the volume and
very intimately tie the well log impedance data to the seismic
data. Utilizing inverted data at the beginning of the
interpretation
process requires that the geoscientist understand the rock
properties in the target area before embarking on an “attribute”
interpretation
. Even when the P impedance data do not clearly
distinguish between fluids or lithologies, value is added by using
these data as the first
interpretation
tool. The simplicity in
knowing that the change of values represents a change in rock
properties without the complexity of wavelet variability is a
distinct advantage to the interpreter. This initial process is critical
to undertaking any
interpretation
of seismic data. Seismic data,
being an interface property, contain tuning, side lobe effects, and
phase and frequency variability, making it difficult to directly
determine the geology. Inverted data, layer properties, are a more
intuitive geologic tool that allows interpreters to utilize their
natural ability to “see” the geology in the seismic data.
Today, advanced impedance tools use angle-stack
data and shear log components that can
aid in distinguishing between lithologies and
hydrocarbon properties. These data combine
the benefits of angle data,
AVO
, and rock
properties, which—when analyzed together
with an understanding of the depositional
environments, stratigraphic concepts, and the
myriad of seismic
attributes
—can greatly increase the interpretative
ability of the geoscientist.
This presentation will demonstrate the necessity for inversion
and explain why it is beneficial in an
interpretation
workflow. It
will examine both the strengths and drawbacks of using inverted
data as compared with the seismic data and the original rock
data. It will also show
- how scale differences between various data types can affect the results,
- how the interpreter analyzes the rock properties and utilizes these with inverted data, and
- how to spot pitfalls in the overuse of impedance data.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 13---------------