About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Uses, Abuses and Examples of
Seismic
-Derived
Acoustic Impedance
Data
:
What Does the Interpreter Need to Know?
Seismic
-Derived
Acoustic Impedance
Data
:
What Does the Interpreter Need to Know?By
Chevron Energy Technology Company
Houston
Throughout the years there has been a concerted effort to
integrate the geoscience disciplines to become more adept at
understanding the petroleum potential of an area. In the 1980s,
geophysicists interpreted 2D
seismic
data
by overlaying log
data
on paper
seismic
sections and using generalized depth-to-time
curves to determine which events represented
markers on the logs. Geologists interpreted
cross-sections by drawing straight lines
between wells to represent their correlations.
Because technology advances have changed the
process, many people today have become “interpreters”
of 2D or 3D
data
on workstations where
the log
data
,
seismic
data
and many derivations
of the
seismic
data
(attributes, coherence, P
impedance, inversions, elastic impedance, lambda rho, etc.) are
available to fine-tune the analysis process. The question, however,
still remains: Are we integrating the
data
yet?
Inversion of
seismic
data
into acoustic impedance provides a
natural tie to the log impedance
data
and forces the geoscientist,
in analyzing
seismic
data
, to extract appropriate wavelets,
determine the phase and amplitude of the
data
, determine
whether or not the phase is stable throughout the volume and
very intimately tie the well log impedance
data
to the
seismic
data
. Utilizing inverted
data
at the beginning of the
interpretation
process requires that the geoscientist understand the rock
properties in the target area before embarking on an “attribute”
interpretation
. Even when the P impedance
data
do not clearly
distinguish between fluids or lithologies, value is added by using
these
data
as the first
interpretation
tool. The simplicity in
knowing that the change of values represents a change in rock
properties without the complexity of wavelet variability is a
distinct advantage to the interpreter. This initial process is critical
to undertaking any
interpretation
of
seismic
data
.
Seismic
data
,
being an interface property, contain tuning, side lobe effects, and
phase and frequency variability, making it difficult to directly
determine the geology. Inverted
data
, layer properties, are a more
intuitive geologic tool that allows interpreters to utilize their
natural ability to “see” the geology in the
seismic
data
.
Today, advanced impedance tools use angle-stack
data
and shear log components that can
aid in distinguishing between lithologies and
hydrocarbon properties. These
data
combine
the benefits of angle
data
, AVO, and rock
properties, which—when analyzed together
with an understanding of the depositional
environments, stratigraphic concepts, and the
myriad of
seismic
attributes—can greatly increase the interpretative
ability of the geoscientist.
This presentation will demonstrate the necessity for inversion
and explain why it is beneficial in an
interpretation
workflow. It
will examine both the strengths and drawbacks of using inverted
data
as compared with the
seismic
data
and the original rock
data
. It will also show
- how scale differences between various
data
types can affect
the results, - how the interpreter analyzes the rock properties and utilizes
these with inverted
data
, and - how to spot pitfalls in the overuse of impedance
data
.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 13---------------