About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Uses, Abuses and Examples of
Seismic
-Derived
Acoustic Impedance Data:
What Does the Interpreter Need to Know?
Seismic
-Derived
Acoustic Impedance Data:
What Does the Interpreter Need to Know?By
Chevron Energy Technology Company
Houston
Throughout the years there has been a concerted effort to
integrate the geoscience disciplines to become more adept at
understanding the petroleum potential of an area. In the 1980s,
geophysicists interpreted 2D
seismic
data by overlaying log data
on paper
seismic
sections and using generalized depth-to-time
curves to determine which events represented
markers on the logs. Geologists interpreted
cross-sections by drawing straight lines
between wells to represent their correlations.
Because technology advances have changed the
process, many people today have become “interpreters”
of 2D or 3D data on workstations where
the log data,
seismic
data and many derivations
of the
seismic
data (attributes, coherence, P
impedance, inversions, elastic impedance, lambda rho, etc.) are
available to fine-tune the analysis process. The question, however,
still remains: Are we integrating the data yet?
Inversion of
seismic
data into acoustic impedance provides a
natural tie to the log impedance data and forces the geoscientist,
in analyzing
seismic
data, to extract appropriate wavelets,
determine the
phase
and amplitude of the data, determine
whether or not the
phase
is stable throughout the volume and
very intimately tie the well log impedance data to the
seismic
data. Utilizing inverted data at the beginning of the interpretation
process requires that the geoscientist understand the rock
properties in the target area before embarking on an “attribute”
interpretation. Even when the P impedance data do not clearly
distinguish between fluids or lithologies, value is added by using
these data as the first interpretation tool. The simplicity in
knowing that the change of values represents a change in rock
properties without the complexity of wavelet variability is a
distinct advantage to the interpreter. This initial process is critical
to undertaking any interpretation of
seismic
data.
Seismic
data,
being an interface property, contain tuning, side lobe effects, and
phase
and frequency variability, making it difficult to directly
determine the geology. Inverted data, layer properties, are a more
intuitive geologic tool that allows interpreters to utilize their
natural ability to “see” the geology in the
seismic
data.
Today, advanced impedance tools use angle-stack
data and shear log components that can
aid in distinguishing between lithologies and
hydrocarbon properties. These data combine
the benefits of angle data, AVO, and rock
properties, which—when analyzed together
with an understanding of the depositional
environments, stratigraphic concepts, and the
myriad of
seismic
attributes—can greatly increase the interpretative
ability of the geoscientist.
This presentation will demonstrate the necessity for inversion
and explain why it is beneficial in an interpretation workflow. It
will examine both the strengths and drawbacks of using inverted
data as compared with the
seismic
data and the original rock
data. It will also show
- how scale differences between various data types can affect the results,
- how the interpreter analyzes the rock properties and utilizes these with inverted data, and
- how to spot pitfalls in the overuse of impedance data.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 13---------------